IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sipbrandy] OSRTP Question

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 23 September 2016 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C483C12BB86 for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izBoUqYZ3IEx for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B474212BBB0 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8N0SWKB085832 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:28:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: sipbrandy@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:28:32 -0500
Message-ID: <35CFE35E-E48B-419F-9557-B38A967CE797@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/rIU1K9kudqRMc18bDR1QM5BSfbw>
Subject: [Sipbrandy] OSRTP Question
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:28:36 -0000

Hi,

In the discussions about what status OSRTP should be, I was under the 
impression that people thought that the draft modified (or violated) 
some normative statement about using encryption with AVP rather than 
SAVP. Can anyone point me to the specifics?

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email