Re: [sipcore] New Version Notification for draft-winterbottom-sipcore-locparam-01.txt

Is there a practical difference between who determined location and who put it in the header?

Is there a reason you can’t (or even more likely, wouldn’t normally) dereference the URI, and thus get the <provided-by> 
in every circumstance where the locparam would be used?

Brian

> On May 23, 2017, at 3:35 PM, James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Provided-by doesn’t work for two reasons.
> 
> 1) Provided-by says who determined the location, not who put the thing into the geolocation header
> 2) provided-by only works if you sending location by value, which in the European case we are not.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 23 May 2017, at 11:40 pm, Brian Rosen <brtech99@icloud.com> wrote:
>> 
>> <as individual>
>> I had asked a question on this, which was, why isn’t <provided-by> an acceptable solution to the problem?
>> 
>> I didn’t see an answer.
>> 
>> Brian
>>> On May 23, 2017, at 9:04 AM, R.Jesske@telekom.de wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> After reworking the draft due to the comments made by Dale, I have uploaded a new version
>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-winterbottom-sipcore-locparam-01.txt
>>> 
>>> I didn't get any comments on my answers given to Dales mail which also covered the comments made within the meeting report.
>>> 
>>> ETSI is still looking forward on processing this document for their solution on Emergency Call due to the Project of  the European Union Mandate: M493.
>>> 
>>> Comments and improvements are welcome.
>>> 
>>> Question is how to proceed further since I did not get any further comments since my last mail on 4th April.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards
>>> 
>>> Roland
>>> 
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Mai 2017 14:45
>>>> An: Jesske, Roland; Bruno Chatras; James Winterbottom; Andrew Hutton
>>>> Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-winterbottom-sipcore-
>>>> locparam-01.txt
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-winterbottom-sipcore-locparam-01.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Roland Jesske and posted to the IETF
>>>> repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Name:		draft-winterbottom-sipcore-locparam
>>>> Revision:	01
>>>> Title:		Location Source Parameter for the SIP Geolocation
>>>> Header Field
>>>> Document date:	2017-05-23
>>>> Group:		Individual Submission
>>>> Pages:		8
>>>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-winterbottom-
>>>> sipcore-locparam-01.txt
>>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-winterbottom-
>>>> sipcore-locparam/
>>>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-winterbottom-sipcore-
>>>> locparam-01
>>>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
>>>> winterbottom-sipcore-locparam-01
>>>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-winterbottom-
>>>> sipcore-locparam-01
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> There are some circumstances where a geolocation header field may
>>>> contain more than one location value.  Knowing the identity of the
>>>> node adding the location value allows the recipient more freedom in
>>>> selecting the value to look at first rather than relying solely on
>>>> the order of the location values.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>>>> tools.ietf.org.
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipcore mailing list
>>> sipcore@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore