[sipcore] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-07: (with COMMENT)

[Spencer Dawkins <[e-mail]>]

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems to me that the title and abstract aren't particularly useful in
helping a reader determine whether this is a document that's useful to read.

The information in the Introduction helps a LOT (starting with the point that
this work is done in response to requirements from 3GPP). Is it possible that
part of that information could appear in the title and abstract, to make this
document more accessible?