[sipcore] rfc3265bis: SIP events redux [was Minutes Posted]

Hi,

For the 3265bis thing the following is stated:

"Unless there are objections on the list, the draft will go into WGLC with these changes."

I think there are still a few issues we need to solve before we should go to WGLC.

1. As indicated in the meeting (also stated in the report), we need to discuss when REFER implicit subscriptions are created - on REFER 200 OK or on NOTIFY.

2. There is still an open issue in the draft whether timer N applies to proxies. I may have missed it, but I don't see any conclusion on that. 

3. A while ago there was a discussion on what happens in case timer N expires. There was a suggestion that the subscription would be terminated, but I am not sure whether there is a decission on that. Also, I think that is impacted by the etag issue I raised on the list a few days ago ('RFC3265/3265bis and draft-ietf-sipcore-subnot-etags issue regarding notification suppression').

If Adam's agenda allows it, having dedicated phone meetings to discuss these issue could be a way to move things forward, in order to be able to initiate the WGLC.

Regards,

Christer

________________________________________
From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach [adam@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:38 PM
To: SIPCORE
Subject: [sipcore] Minutes Posted

[as chair]

A draft version of the minutes from the recent IETF meeting in Anaheim
has been posted to the proceedings site:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/sipcore.html

Please review the minutes and submit any corrections to the chairs no
later than April 15th. Thank you.

/a
_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore