Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance ?

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 13 July 2011 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BE411E80D3 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.205
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.395, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPbsXVWQCbVk for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672211E80B2 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6DIdjuV007679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:39:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4E1DE671.503@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:39:45 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <BFF49F39-2884-41ED-8905-57D4A8FFDAD2@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <BFF49F39-2884-41ED-8905-57D4A8FFDAD2@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance@tools.ietf.org>, "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance ?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:39:55 -0000

[as chair]

On 7/13/11 5:20 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> what is the status of draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance? It is fairly close to completion, I guess.
> I did not see a new version submitted for this submission deadline and there are still a few remarks from the IESG to address, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance/ballot/

It would be unusual to allow meeting schedules to cause premature 
publication of a document in IESG review. The authors are presently 
working with the IESG to address the issues raised in the ballot. You 
can expect to see a new version once the IESG is satisfied with the 
authors' proposed changes.


> I read through the document and here are my review comments:
>

Thanks for taking the time to review the document. Your input will be 
treated as IETF last call comments.

/a