Re: [sipcore] RFC 6223 on Indication of Support for Keep-Alive
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 12:52 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18302E06F5 for <sipcore@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wv3pyyWYIvAH for <sipcore@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE90E06BD for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pkyzivat@cisco.com; l=3252; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302612735; x=1303822335; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5+rSArBxn8HN5qO8Xf1S+IJdkNilb8fxuOsAMbNahEU=; b=kF4xYPP0fR3Lfj9wa6Csn9olA0vz03TSDLCqQ0s121AJlkxox4yp5xU4 eSmcSav3bQJb6mXqUxgOHwAW6k4QlOzFFwui/2JfknoyrhkvtBfzNr5Ix P89IqPpO4pKh6YFZuZIRQ9LmmUFXGyDqGfvIrto/pqYoi82qJECe7KTJ2 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAB9KpE2tJV2Z/2dsb2JhbACmKneIepwynHqFbgSNYoNu
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,195,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="335378097"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2011 12:52:14 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.125] (dhcp-161-44-174-125.cisco.com [161.44.174.125]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3CCqEO4023252 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:52:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4DA44AFD.7040502@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:52:13 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sipcore@ietf.org
References: <20110411192110.DB3ADE0785@rfc-editor.org> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0875E32E7E@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0875E32E7E@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [sipcore] RFC 6223 on Indication of Support for Keep-Alive
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:52:17 -0000
On 4/12/2011 4:41 AM, Elwell, John wrote: > I guess it is too late now, but how did this get through without "SIP" in the title? I guess nobody thought about it. Is there a rule about that? Thanks, Paul > John > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >> Sent: 11 April 2011 20:21 >> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org; rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org >> Cc: sipcore@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >> Subject: RFC 6223 on Indication of Support for Keep-Alive >> >> >> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >> >> >> RFC 6223 >> >> Title: Indication of Support for Keep-Alive >> Author: C. Holmberg >> Status: Standards Track >> Stream: IETF >> Date: April 2011 >> Mailbox: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com >> Pages: 18 >> Characters: 41439 >> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >> >> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-12.txt >> >> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6223.txt >> >> This specification defines a new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) >> Via header field parameter, "keep", which allows adjacent SIP >> entities to explicitly negotiate usage of the Network Address >> Translation (NAT) keep-alive mechanisms defined in SIP Outbound, in >> cases where SIP Outbound is not supported, cannot be applied, or >> where usage of keep-alives is not implicitly negotiated as part of >> the SIP Outbound negotiation. [STANDARDS-TRACK] >> >> This document is a product of the Session Initiation Protocol >> Core Working Group of the IETF. >> >> This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. >> >> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track >> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion >> and suggestions >> for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet >> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and >> status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. >> >> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. >> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see >> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >> >> For searching the RFC series, see >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. >> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. >> >> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >> author of the RFC in question, or to >> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless >> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for >> unlimited distribution. >> >> >> The RFC Editor Team >> Association Management Solutions, LLC >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IETF-Announce mailing list >> IETF-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >> > _______________________________________________ > sipcore mailing list > sipcore@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore >
- [sipcore] RFC 6223 on Indication of Support for K… rfc-editor
- Re: [sipcore] RFC 6223 on Indication of Support f… Elwell, John
- Re: [sipcore] RFC 6223 on Indication of Support f… Paul Kyzivat