[sipcore] UAC or UAS
"Klatsky, Carl" <Carl_Klatsky@cable.comcast.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <carl_klatsky@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819461AE263 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:32:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eOmTpczKtqep for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [69.241.43.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7721D1ADF34 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 06:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([24.40.56.116]) by pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 97wm3m1.75521866; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:31:56 -0500
Received: from PACDCEXMB12.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.6.249]) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::5527:6d6b:29a7:f414%13]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:31:56 -0500
From: "Klatsky, Carl" <Carl_Klatsky@cable.comcast.com>
To: "'sipcore@ietf.org'" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: UAC or UAS
Thread-Index: Ac706x/ThtcF14MnRhWvlCKibdf7BA==
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:31:06 +0000
Message-ID: <6C15A6B88541034E912E94C2D8BC3E87F770AA11@PACDCEXMB12.cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [24.40.56.174]
x-wiganss: 0100000001001Epacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ID0048<6C15A6B88541034E912E94C2D8BC3E87F770AA11@PACDCEXMB12.cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6C15A6B88541034E912E94C2D8BC3E87F770AA11PACDCEXMB12cabl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sipcore] UAC or UAS
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:32:05 -0000
Hi SIPcore, In this exchange between A and B: B sends A an INVITE with no SDP A replies with a 200 OK with SDP B replies with an ACK with SDP Is A the UAS or UAC in this scenario? I thought A would be UAS but wanted to check with the SIP community. Thanks. Regards, Carl Klatsky Comcast
- Re: [sipcore] UAC or UAS Brett Tate
- [sipcore] UAC or UAS Klatsky, Carl