[sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00: comments

Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> Wed, 04 March 2015 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <brett@broadsoft.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5B41A9142 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:41:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nq7ZHd2i6rRd for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090F81A9166 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgaj5 with SMTP id j5so834188qga.12 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=amVzJAYPqfK8RV5yqq6u4dH8HpeSNbzZyUDi3GHCg/s=; b=ZHAY6Z1ySVC54q397VYGajsn6DUl/M4tICRCq4EQduKapgBK9NrQPcbfHMzVmS6kSY MkA7WfWghQ2hXhGNTDmzVDT5qj8EaHTzRMq4CIXadV4PRrut7iDfq0ZAaZmNoLgrFNI+ FKImUn3eDIS6ds7jNH/QB3rPfsL5J0WThbPP4eYwQYl29ZLDqqSgpq22jgnZy6lw3lph QucqqsFmLpxwes6pmMkKYd1VgFsNXuzEuYHWJf9cOnEVrmd7DU9yC+Ldz4rQBExFIiDg KbOR107wlTnqwdpwuaCKKxnZIYkg3SMeh3RuFRQSwaJzieNoQ0ne619FQAKG0SuYTHVU EYpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFIOKdeJb1ZEjGEGOxd/m/3RrXu42VQqy4yg+7BYP5lIxALftsBEj4TChLAuZcNA48Jej0
X-Received: by 10.229.68.136 with SMTP id v8mr7485954qci.16.1425490860206; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdBWokOHsByySffSTl2nHfhLhrzDnA==
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:40:58 -0500
Message-ID: <14335066f1d02c25df6eb6c3d81af23e@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification@tools.ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/LdLuMzwPoV9A9eVoT7rBS35BR0Y>
Subject: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00: comments
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:41:28 -0000

Hi,

The following are some comments concerning
draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00.

Thanks,
Brett

------

1) Section 1: RFC2119 should be RFC6665.

2) Section 2 paragraph 5: Should potentially change "obscure cases" to
"cases".  The situation can be as simple as an RFC 3725 3PCC device
willing to accept REFER associated with some dialogs but not others.

3) Section 2 paragraph 5: Concerning "(although the use of GRUUs in such a
context causes no harm, either)", it is only true if you exclude things
such as the Security Considerations mentioned within RFC 5627.  Thus it
potentially should be removed or reworded.

4) Section 3: Should potentially mention RFC 5627 since the clarification
also clarifies that the RFC 5627 security issues apply to all notifiers
(or the location they supplied within the Contact).