[sipcore] RFC 3265 -- I forgot to mention...
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893521F8B0C for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dye0nxOxCRHC for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F8B21F8B3D for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (dhcp-47dd.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.71.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6RHsqAJ066507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:54:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4E3050EB.3030606@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:54:51 -0400
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 130.129.71.221 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: [sipcore] RFC 3265 -- I forgot to mention...
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:54:56 -0000
Christer pointed out a change that I forgot to mention during the
session on Monday:
If a SUBSCRIBE request to refresh a subscription receives a 404, 405,
410, 416, 480-485, 489, 501, or 604 response, the subscriber MUST
consider the subscription terminated.
This normative "MUST" used to be a lowercase "should." This change was
already discussed on the list -- I'm just pointing it out again because
I didn't mention it during the face-to-face meeting.
/a
- [sipcore] RFC 3265 -- I forgot to mention... Adam Roach