IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 02 March 2015 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959AF1A8879 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:55:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFdbUvpvPva4 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D53E1A8877 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t22HtMk4041156 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:55:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <54F4A405.1090703@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:55:17 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sipcore@ietf.org
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D71E5A8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D71E5A8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010103090009050407050703"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/Xsdd91eSY-FIVPxU5RjZvkAu2Sk>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:55:30 -0000

Thanks for the two pointers, Christer.
I've been on vacation (!) for a couple of weeks - I'm back now, and will 
reply to those messages in their threads.

Are there any other unaddressed comments you are aware of?

RjS

On 2/28/15 6:02 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg06488.html
>
> *From:*sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Christer Holmberg
> *Sent:* 28 February 2015 08:11
> *To:* Adam Roach; 'SIPCORE'; Ivo Sedlacek; Brett Tate
> *Subject:* Re: [sipcore] Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: 
> REFER-related work
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> A while ago I had a comment on the refer-clarification draft, which 
> Robert said he was going to address during the WGLC.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *Adam Roach <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>
> *Sent: *‎28/‎02/‎2015 02:08
> *To: *Christer Holmberg <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; 
> 'SIPCORE' <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>; Ivo Sedlacek 
> <mailto:ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com>; Brett Tate 
> <mailto:brett@broadsoft.com>
> *Subject: *Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work
>
> [as chair]
>
> The adoption and WGLC period for the three documents has ended. Given
> the expressed support (meager as it was) and lack of objection, we're
> going to consider the 6665-clarifications draft adopted.
>
> There were no additional comments on refer-clarifications or
> refer-explicit-subscription, so we will begin preparing them for IESG
> review.
>
> [as author]
>
> A new version that I believe addresses the outstanding comments on the
> 6665 clarification document is available here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification/
>
> Ivo / Brett: as you were the people who provided the feedback that I've
> incorporated, please look over this latest text to let me know whether
> it addresses the specific concern that had been raised. Thanks!
>
> /a
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email