IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9044A129B13; Fri, 26 May 2017 10:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QMR_TjEr4sL; Fri, 26 May 2017 10:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DA0129B1A; Fri, 26 May 2017 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-307ff70000004a6a-4a-59286ba46c62
Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.57]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DC.9A.19050.4AB68295; Fri, 26 May 2017 19:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB109.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.30]) by ESESSHC013.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.57]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Fri, 26 May 2017 19:53:39 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id.all@ietf.org>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST
Thread-Index: AQHS1hd1b6bmbyrEbUuHjC4DfZ2VqqIGrF2AgAA3o1A=
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 17:53:39 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CBCBE9D@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
References: <D54DF3B2.1D309%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <528630A5-051A-4116-9D5C-79755DF347B3@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <528630A5-051A-4116-9D5C-79755DF347B3@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7pe7SbI1Ig94OQYv5nafZLWae3cVi 8fXHJjYHZo8lS34yecza+YQlgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2PC24UsBTs4K+601DYwzuDsYuTk kBAwkeif9Zq5i5GLQ0jgCKPE7Lfb2CGcxYwSO1ftZOti5OBgE7CQ6P6nDdIgIqAk8bx5KwtI DbNAB6PE0yV9rCA1wgK+Ev/PiULUBEj83LuVCcK2kmi/+YoJpIRFQFXi5EQfkDAvSPXXqYwg tpBAgcTWS9/BbE4Be4llq+axg9iMAmIS30+tARvDLCAucevJfCaImwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyP FcJWklix/RIjyCpmAU2J9bv0IVoVJaZ0P2SHWCsocXLmE5YJjKKzkEydhdAxC0nHLCQdCxhZ VjGKFqcWF+emGxnppRZlJhcX5+fp5aWWbGIERsrBLb+tdjAefO54iFGAg1GJh/dzikakEGti WXFl7iFGCQ5mJRFebRWgEG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcV6HfRcihATSE0tSs1NTC1KL YLJMHJxSDYwrduV+Off3nOfSzqzL/HOmqsrcqi+NP6cV27H05/RLxyJ8RAvD3ae7Ndq53Jfs MZrzuvtFVSLD871f2vTTdxX8DVYWspxrcz/mc13P2tkNDkp/XV93ruyRttihXNfIfXfVEtUN +80u9F2VVihexS39WHHTWob29CS7XovPbzkSMmZL+8bWTlFiKc5INNRiLipOBACkki6nkAIA AA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/Zz-UC8_x23LzJxqtAcIjUBjSajc>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 17:53:45 -0000

Hi,

...

>> However, I wasn't sure how to address the following comment:
>> 
>> "1.2 and 1.3: A sentence or two that more strongly contrasts "body part"
>> vs "message-body" would be helpful. I think that some people will 
>> think of a message-body as still a body-part.˛
>> 
>> I think section 1.1 describes the difference between a message-body 
>> and a body-part. I donąt think we should copy/paste that in sections 
>> 1.2 and 1.3. Or, did I misunderstand you comment?
>
> On reflection, I think this might be fine like it is. I know that some people casually refer to the entire body as still a “part”, but 
> that doesn’t seem to be reflected in the MIME RFCs. Let’s see if anyone comments in LC.

Ok.

I'll wait for Jean's comment regarding usage-of-Content-ID-outside-the-SIP-message before submitting a new version.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email