[sipcore] [Errata Verified] RFC6442 (5027)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 25 January 2018 16:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3557C12E882; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:29:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoWFZHqLf_Ah; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D962F12DA73; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0280FB80E13; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:29:20 -0800 (PST)
To: lreeder@bandwidth.com, jmpolk@cisco.com, br@brianrosen.net, jon.peterson@neustar.biz
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ben@nostrum.com, iesg@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180125162921.0280FB80E13@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:29:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/b0MFLulViUA2Q_QJT0Lil6sSPWA>
Subject: [sipcore] [Errata Verified] RFC6442 (5027)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:29:39 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6442, "Location Conveyance for the Session Initiation Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5027 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Larry Reeder <lreeder@bandwidth.com> Date Reported: 2017-05-31 Verified by: Ben Campbell (IESG) Section: 5.1 Original Text ------------- --boundary1 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml Content-ID: <target123@atlanta.example.com> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <presence Corrected Text -------------- --boundary1 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml Content-ID: <target123@atlanta.example.com> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <presence Notes ----- The PIDF-LO examples in RFC 6442 don't have an empty line between the message headers and the message body in the pidf+xml bodies. RFC 2046, section 5.1 says this about multipart MIME body parts: " After its boundary delimiter line, each body part then consists of a header area, a blank line, and a body area". This errata also applies to the example in section 5.2 -------------------------------------- RFC6442 (draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Location Conveyance for the Session Initiation Protocol Publication Date : December 2011 Author(s) : J. Polk, B. Rosen, J. Peterson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Session Initiation Protocol Core RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [sipcore] [Errata Verified] RFC6442 (5027) RFC Errata System