Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00
<R.Jesske@telekom.de> Wed, 05 April 2017 05:33 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=261e66939=R.Jesske@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4919F129416 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telekom.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJEFaMPN4Wpv for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILOUT21.telekom.de (MAILOUT21.telekom.de [80.149.113.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 242BE126C26 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telekom.de; i=@telekom.de; q=dns/txt; s=dtag1; t=1491370426; x=1522906426; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Bq43gQuTuI8vwYaGJJwYdHjmWbU8oQMVvYKf00andn0=; b=j/C/tG8JZtG0iqxPzjv29g5r3FgFwK8r+IAwkhgraE8DcFgwsQuqeDO5 r5SBt/JnlCHOqhkpPrCxio4DqHoICvl5ZMWXcFAk6WP884Us5nI40c2vv +wm2CKX31i4503x42qxvkYZYAGZZHaRRRgDMDf/pdDmeUtJtfdfXM88bf YzCGxYCQ2I6oydc6ovroVuOlfId6G39IBcEAnVTM9iN/+KXhuKLzXuUuP 6zH6kv514FQfYNPmd7+ZyAPYjmhCieD9vUqBeGDiSG4t9Cxxk6ILmpScf 1JiYIx8VmUHn0j1xmNhRrfKPqeGNSwOl3xYU+/622Gklkz9VyS6qadz9Y Q==;
Received: from q4de8psa04t.blf.telekom.de ([10.151.13.130]) by MAILOUT21.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Apr 2017 07:33:42 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,277,1486422000"; d="scan'208,217";a="649389454"
Received: from he105829.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.169.119.32]) by Q4DE8PSA04V.blf.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2017 07:33:42 +0200
Received: from HE105828.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.31) by HE105829.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:33:41 +0200
Received: from HE105828.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::753e:c05:6c77:b585]) by HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::753e:c05:6c77:b585%26]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:33:41 +0200
From: R.Jesske@telekom.de
To: ranjitkav0811@gmail.com
CC: mahoney@nostrum.com, sipcore@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00
Thread-Index: AQHSqaQWpesEhUHcIkeKIYpECUFQFaGu4YUwgAZZq4CAAQnzMA==
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:33:41 +0000
Message-ID: <7ff26f92f4114c28aeddf198b37c2b12@HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <25855_1489353730_58C5BC02_25855_10494_1_8B970F90C584EA4E97D5BAAC9172DBB81C935BDC@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <58b9213c-1fb1-95f7-6888-60f7a754fc4f@nostrum.com> <f7467708296648d6a8877e9b3956de53@HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CA+CMEWd3+dd+m8DjUyyiCm_Xe+9S3E2+jhPN7+z0UwcbSfjzgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+CMEWd3+dd+m8DjUyyiCm_Xe+9S3E2+jhPN7+z0UwcbSfjzgw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.213.239.211]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7ff26f92f4114c28aeddf198b37c2b12HE105828emea1cdstintern_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/bupq-HhxAHrWz4mGD9dGPfyHcqU>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:33:52 -0000
Hi, Thank you for your comment. I think it is sufficient that only with the appearance of the parameter it is shown that a orig-cdiv has been done. The outgoing leg of the S-CSCF has to know if a CDIV appeared. All standard procedures, i.e. no cdiv appeared, will be triggered anyway. This does not need a orig-cdiv=no. Please keep in mind this draft is 3GPP IMS specific. Best regards Roland Von: Ranjit Avasarala [mailto:ranjitkav0811@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. April 2017 17:28 An: Jesske, Roland Cc: mahoney@nostrum.com; SIPCORE Betreff: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00 Hi I read thru the draft and yes the additional parameter in P-Served-user makes sense to better handle call diversion service. But I think a value for "orig-cdiv" may be required . e.g orig-cdiv=yes (default). though I do not have a use case for orig-cdiv=no as of now. Regards Ranjit On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:29 AM, <R.Jesske@telekom.de<mailto:R.Jesske@telekom.de>> wrote: Hi Jean, I have read Marianne's draft and support the draft to become a WG document. Best Regards Roland -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org>] Im Auftrag von A. Jean Mahoney Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 17:22 An: sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> Betreff: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00 Hi all, I mentioned this draft during the WG session today. Does anyone have any comments on the draft? Should it become a WG document? Thanks! Jean On 3/12/17 4:22 PM, marianne.mohali@orange.com<mailto:marianne.mohali@orange.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find hereafter a new version of I-D, > draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00 (was > draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter-03). > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mohali-sipcore-originating- > cdiv-parameter-00.txt > > Based on ADs and Chairs guidance, this draft is moved from DISPATCH > to SIPCORE following the new charter of sipcore WG. > > Abstract: This specification defines a new parameter of the > P-Served-User header field in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). > This new "orig-cdiv" parameter defines the session case used by a > proxy when handling an originating session after Call Diversion > (CDIV) services has been invoked for the served user. The > P-Served-User header field is defined in RFC5502 to convey the > identity of the served user and the session case that applies to this > particular communication session and application invocation. This > document updates RFC5502 to add the "originating after CDIV" session > case and to provide more guidance for using the P-Served-User header > field in IP networks that were missing in RFC5502. > >> From the discussion in DISPATCH, in this version of the draft, the >> syntax of the header could be improved as shown below: > > sessioncase-param = ("sescase" EQUAL ("orig" / "term")) / > "orig-cdiv" registration-state-param = "regstate" EQUAL ("unreg" / > "reg") > > This draft is not in the agenda for IETF 98 but comments are welcomed > anyway. > > Best regards, Marianne > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have > received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this > message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not > liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list > sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore > _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
- [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-origina… marianne.mohali
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… DOLLY, MARTIN C
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… Andrew Allen
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… Atle Monrad
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… Ranjit Avasarala
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-ori… A. Jean Mahoney