Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00

<R.Jesske@telekom.de> Wed, 05 April 2017 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=261e66939=R.Jesske@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4919F129416 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telekom.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJEFaMPN4Wpv for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILOUT21.telekom.de (MAILOUT21.telekom.de [80.149.113.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 242BE126C26 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telekom.de; i=@telekom.de; q=dns/txt; s=dtag1; t=1491370426; x=1522906426; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Bq43gQuTuI8vwYaGJJwYdHjmWbU8oQMVvYKf00andn0=; b=j/C/tG8JZtG0iqxPzjv29g5r3FgFwK8r+IAwkhgraE8DcFgwsQuqeDO5 r5SBt/JnlCHOqhkpPrCxio4DqHoICvl5ZMWXcFAk6WP884Us5nI40c2vv +wm2CKX31i4503x42qxvkYZYAGZZHaRRRgDMDf/pdDmeUtJtfdfXM88bf YzCGxYCQ2I6oydc6ovroVuOlfId6G39IBcEAnVTM9iN/+KXhuKLzXuUuP 6zH6kv514FQfYNPmd7+ZyAPYjmhCieD9vUqBeGDiSG4t9Cxxk6ILmpScf 1JiYIx8VmUHn0j1xmNhRrfKPqeGNSwOl3xYU+/622Gklkz9VyS6qadz9Y Q==;
Received: from q4de8psa04t.blf.telekom.de ([10.151.13.130]) by MAILOUT21.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Apr 2017 07:33:42 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,277,1486422000"; d="scan'208,217";a="649389454"
Received: from he105829.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.169.119.32]) by Q4DE8PSA04V.blf.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2017 07:33:42 +0200
Received: from HE105828.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.31) by HE105829.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:33:41 +0200
Received: from HE105828.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::753e:c05:6c77:b585]) by HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::753e:c05:6c77:b585%26]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:33:41 +0200
From: R.Jesske@telekom.de
To: ranjitkav0811@gmail.com
CC: mahoney@nostrum.com, sipcore@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00
Thread-Index: AQHSqaQWpesEhUHcIkeKIYpECUFQFaGu4YUwgAZZq4CAAQnzMA==
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:33:41 +0000
Message-ID: <7ff26f92f4114c28aeddf198b37c2b12@HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <25855_1489353730_58C5BC02_25855_10494_1_8B970F90C584EA4E97D5BAAC9172DBB81C935BDC@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <58b9213c-1fb1-95f7-6888-60f7a754fc4f@nostrum.com> <f7467708296648d6a8877e9b3956de53@HE105828.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CA+CMEWd3+dd+m8DjUyyiCm_Xe+9S3E2+jhPN7+z0UwcbSfjzgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+CMEWd3+dd+m8DjUyyiCm_Xe+9S3E2+jhPN7+z0UwcbSfjzgw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.213.239.211]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7ff26f92f4114c28aeddf198b37c2b12HE105828emea1cdstintern_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/bupq-HhxAHrWz4mGD9dGPfyHcqU>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:33:52 -0000

Hi,
Thank you for your comment. I think it is sufficient that only with the appearance of the parameter it is shown that a orig-cdiv has been done. The outgoing leg of the S-CSCF has to know if a CDIV appeared.
All standard procedures, i.e. no cdiv appeared, will be triggered anyway. This does not need a orig-cdiv=no.
Please keep in mind this draft is 3GPP IMS specific.

Best regards

Roland

Von: Ranjit Avasarala [mailto:ranjitkav0811@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. April 2017 17:28
An: Jesske, Roland
Cc: mahoney@nostrum.com; SIPCORE
Betreff: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00

Hi

I read thru the draft and yes the additional parameter in P-Served-user makes sense to better handle call diversion service.  But I think a value for "orig-cdiv" may be required . e.g orig-cdiv=yes (default).  though I do not have a use case for orig-cdiv=no as of now.

Regards
Ranjit


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:29 AM, <R.Jesske@telekom.de<mailto:R.Jesske@telekom.de>> wrote:
Hi Jean,
I have read Marianne's draft and support the draft to become a WG document.
Best Regards

Roland

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org>] Im Auftrag von A. Jean Mahoney
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 17:22
An: sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
Betreff: Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00

Hi all,

I mentioned this draft during the WG session today. Does anyone have any comments on the draft? Should it become a WG document?

Thanks!

Jean

On 3/12/17 4:22 PM, marianne.mohali@orange.com<mailto:marianne.mohali@orange.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find hereafter a new version of I-D,
> draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-cdiv-parameter-00 (was
> draft-mohali-dispatch-originating-cdiv-parameter-03).
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mohali-sipcore-originating-
> cdiv-parameter-00.txt
>
>  Based on ADs and Chairs guidance, this draft is moved from DISPATCH
> to SIPCORE following the new charter of sipcore WG.
>
> Abstract: This specification defines a new parameter of the
> P-Served-User header field in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).
> This new "orig-cdiv" parameter defines the session case used by a
> proxy when handling an originating session after Call Diversion
> (CDIV) services has been invoked for the served user.  The
> P-Served-User header field is defined in RFC5502 to convey the
> identity of the served user and the session case that applies to this
> particular communication session and application invocation.  This
> document updates RFC5502 to add the "originating after CDIV" session
> case and to provide more guidance for using the P-Served-User header
> field in IP networks that were missing in RFC5502.
>
>> From the discussion in DISPATCH, in this version of the draft, the
>> syntax of the header could be improved as shown below:
>
> sessioncase-param        = ("sescase" EQUAL ("orig" / "term")) /
> "orig-cdiv" registration-state-param = "regstate" EQUAL ("unreg" /
> "reg")
>
> This draft is not in the agenda for IETF 98 but comments are welcomed
> anyway.
>
> Best regards, Marianne
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ___________________________________________________
>
>  Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
> be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have
> received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this
> message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not
> liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>

_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore