[sipcore] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7044 (5012)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 May 2017 06:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD681294B5 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 23:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfsLRf81Zr_i for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 23:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01251205F0 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 23:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B472BB80E51; Tue, 9 May 2017 23:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com, francois.audet@skype.net, shida@ntt-at.com, ietf.hanserik@gmail.com, christer.holmberg@ericsson.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, br@brianrosen.net, mahoney@nostrum.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: dinoop.p1@gmail.com, sipcore@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170510061430.B472BB80E51@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 23:14:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/cH5sw8JBP31xo4TMlLlFMANJQQQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 May 2017 04:59:13 -0700
Subject: [sipcore] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7044 (5012)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 06:14:41 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7044, "An Extension to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Request History Information". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5012 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dinoop Paloli <dinoop.p1@gmail.com> Section: 10.1.2 Original Text ------------- If there is not a Privacy header field in the message Corrected Text -------------- If there is no Privacy header field in the message Notes ----- "If there is not a Privacy header" is not a correct sentence. We have to use "If there is no Privacy header" Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7044 (draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-12) -------------------------------------- Title : An Extension to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Request History Information Publication Date : February 2014 Author(s) : M. Barnes, F. Audet, S. Schubert, J. van Elburg, C. Holmberg Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Session Initiation Protocol Core RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [sipcore] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7044 (50… RFC Errata System