Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoptions: Drafts for new milestones

[as chair]

The milestones are approved and appear on the SIP charter page already. 
That action is separate from adoption of drafts for each milestone.

This Call for Adoption that you're responding to extends through Friday, 
as indicated in the initial message below. You can expect the chairs to 
announce consensus (or lack thereof) for each draft early next week.

/a

On 1/24/17 14:18, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of the new milestones? When can the draft-ietf-sicpore drafts be submitted? :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DOLLY, MARTIN C [mailto:md3135@att.com]
> Sent: 16 January 2017 18:38
> To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; 'SIPCORE' <sipcore@ietf.org>; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [sipcore] Call for Adoptions: Drafts for new milestones
>
> I support its adoption.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 4:11 PM
> To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; 'SIPCORE' <sipcore@ietf.org>; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoptions: Drafts for new milestones
>
> Hi,
>
> In addition, I'd like to consider adopting:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-sipcore-sip-authn/
>
> As indicated by Rifaat, while THIS draft was just submitted, it's related to an topic that we have already discussed in the past. Based on discussions with e.g., Jon Peterson, the controversial parts of the previous suggestion has been removed from the new draft.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
> Sent: 13 January 2017 02:52
> To: 'SIPCORE' <sipcore@ietf.org>
> Subject: [sipcore] Call for Adoptions: Drafts for new milestones
>
> [as chair]
>
> As I mentioned in an earlier message, we have new milestones for SIPCORE, many of which we hope to finish in the first half of the year.
> To that end, I'd like to call for adoption of the documents that prompted adding the milestones. To be specific:
>
> We propose adopting draft-schulzrinne-sipcore-callinfo-spam for the milestone "mechanism for labeling the nature of SIP calls"
>
> We propose adopting draft-holmberg-sipcore-content-id for the milestone "clarification of the use of Content-ID"
>
> We propose adopting draft-sparks-sipcore-name-addr-guidance for the milestone "clarification of the use of name-addr"
>
> I'll note that these document -- and in particular the last two -- have had significant discussion and feedback already. In particular, the author of draft-sparks-sipcore-name-addr-guidance indicates that he believes that document is "done" and basically ready for last call.
>
> Please provide feedback regarding adoption of these documents by Friday, January 27. Thanks!
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore