Re: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack milestone
"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 20:37 UTC
Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A5A129B8C for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrpAAAk_RhUH for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B023129AD4 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17562; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494880515; x=1496090115; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=IEHMbMvajkhXfBaxphypdGshcS7THABxQZbRScpKIvY=; b=jAOwiAdvUWHl0Acmi6s20gjDPrUApU71bFwLQv/IysOujhfFh5SeMvkB mHTkvx5DFF3rXXDyyrcfXd1Al3rKY2OuUbyj48y8NMKp7k0YvNjJIKxB5 EfGPx3SSbuIrbZCjPmuMeScmcOkkQM5UFdelyq4a3/D3HoLHdHlpn/P1J g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BQAQCoDxpZ/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5nYoEMB4NkihiRYJA9hTiCDyEBCoUuSgIahRw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRgBAQEBAwEBIUsLDAQCAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIlCxQJCAIEDgUbiggOrF+CJop6AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWGX4IJgnCHdS+CMQEElm+HGwGHG4t/C4F5j2eIf4tDAR84gQpwFUYSAYZjdodfgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,346,1491264000"; d="scan'208,217";a="426192739"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 May 2017 20:35:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4FKZD9k001851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 May 2017 20:35:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:35:13 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 15 May 2017 15:35:13 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
CC: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack milestone
Thread-Index: AQHSwfMi1SPtLrxom0ufEMFt41ORJKHfZhwAgBbNGYCAABI4gA==
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:35:13 +0000
Message-ID: <ED38E7C8-946F-4E31-AB1E-14FEC90010F3@cisco.com>
References: <87bmrdmxo0.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <SN2PR03MB2350EF19DEF8578C7BD35002B2140@SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6d628729-482d-aace-0bb8-ab579d9e316c@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6d628729-482d-aace-0bb8-ab579d9e316c@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.250.251]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ED38E7C8946F4E31AB1E14FEC90010F3ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/gw7aLdtA117bQWVN_BZCP2ucd7s>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack milestone
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:37:58 -0000
Hi Jean - There are two distinct sub-milestones for this milestone, in my opinion. The first one is narrower and can be scoped as Dale indicated: Request publication of a mechanism for rapid dual-stack protocol selection in SIP when the destination has multiple, unprioritized targets for connection-oriented protocols I think draft-johansson-sip-he-connection can be adopted for this. Subsequently we hope to provide a more comprehensive dual-stack solution for SIP along the lines of draft-worley-sipcore-happy-earballs. My preference is we give the latter its due rigor and focus, so I don’t think they should be done in parallel, rather in series. Thanks, Gonzalo On May 15, 2017, at 3:30 PM, A. Jean Mahoney <mahoney@nostrum.com<mailto:mahoney@nostrum.com>> wrote: Hi everyone, Does anyone else have any thoughts on modifying the milestone? As the WG finishes up some of the current milestones and adds new WG documents, we'll need to update our milestone list. Thanks! Jean On 5/1/17 2:18 AM, Asveren, Tolga wrote: I think that is a good idea with a few caveats: i- Connectionless transports should be covered as well (possibly by making use of OPTIONS) ii- Use of multiple interfaces/transport protocols should be mentioned as well. I think this can be done just by adding a few sentences along the lines of: All IP Address Family/Transport Family/Interface triplet combinations should be tried simultaneously. Some headstart may be provided for certain combinations depending on local policy. Otherwise I think it is the right approach not to dive into details of the algorithm to use. Thanks, Tolga -----Original Message----- From: sipcore [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale R. Worley Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 4:46 PM To: sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> Subject: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack milestone The Sipcore working group has the following milestone listed (at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sipcore/about/): Dec 2017 Request publication of mechanisms for rapid dual-stack protocol selection in SIP The draft draft-johansson-sip-he-connection is listed for this milestone. However, that draft covers only a narrow subset of the overall problem. Over the past month or so, I have been canvassing Sipcore members to find out if there is any practical demand for a dual-stack solution for SIP. With the exception of a particular case, I have found no interest. Because of this, I propose that we narrow the scope of this milestone to the one case for which I have found interest: Request publication of a mechanism for rapid dual-stack protocol selection in SIP when the destination has multiple, unprioritized targets for connection-oriented protocols Conveniently, draft-johansson-sip-he-connection describes such a mechanism. Its mechanism closely parallels that of RFC 6555 ("Happy Eyeballs"), and the text is essentially complete. Because there are no unresolved technical issues, the text is complete, and there are known implementation instances where this mechanism is needed, I urge the approval of this draft even if its scope is narrow. Dale _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org<mailto:sipcore@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
- [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack miles… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack m… Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack m… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [sipcore] Proposal to revise the dual stack m… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)