Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7044 (5014)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 15 May 2017 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102A312EA93; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P837cqeEUz1S; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B4912EB06; Mon, 15 May 2017 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v4FEUqL1053572 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 15 May 2017 09:30:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <87o9v0k6wv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 09:31:00 -0500
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <580237CE-94F8-439F-922F-5AA981B6F3FA@nostrum.com>
References: <87o9v0k6wv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/kehH-1VxB8hrjw26pOND6Ld5VVI>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7044 (5014)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:35:46 -0000
Thanks, but does anyone have thoughts on this particular erratum? :-) Ben. > On May 10, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote: > > Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> writes: >> Do people have thoughts on this? > > I haven't dug into this erratum, but there are a number of places in > 7044 where the language isn't as exact as we'd like. > > Dale
- [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7044 (50… RFC Errata System
- [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC704… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… marianne.mohali
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… marianne.mohali
- Re: [sipcore] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Dinoop