Re: [sipcore] Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

[as document editor]

Thanks. I've seen the feedback, but don't currently plan to incorporate 
it. The comment is strictly editorial (an area over which document 
editors are given significant latitude), and -- in my opinion -- is not 
an improvement. It says the same thing, with equivalent clarity, using 
more words.

/a

On 3/19/15 01:36, Ivo Sedlacek wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> my comment 
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg06561.html) 
> has not been addressed yet.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Ivo Sedlacek
>
> This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on 
> the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
> <http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>
>
> *From:*Christer Holmberg
> *Sent:* 17. března 2015 18:25
> *To:* Ivo Sedlacek; Adam Roach; 'SIPCORE'; Brett Tate
> *Subject:* RE: Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this? Has Ivo's comment been addressed?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *Ivo Sedlacek <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Sent: *‎04/‎03/‎2015 10:11
> *To: *Adam Roach <mailto:[e-mail]>; Christer Holmberg 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>; 'SIPCORE' 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>; Brett Tate <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *RE: Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work
>
> Hello,
>
> I reviewed draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-03 and 
> draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-00  and found no 
> issues. OK to progress those drafts.
>
> I reviewed draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00 and sent a comment 
> to the SIPCORE list yesterday 
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg06561.html). 
> I prefer the comment being addressed before progressing the draft.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Ivo Sedlacek
>
> This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on 
> the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
> <http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Roach [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 28. února 2015 1:08
> To: Christer Holmberg; 'SIPCORE'; Ivo Sedlacek; Brett Tate
> Subject: Concluded: WGLC / Call for Adoption: REFER-related work
>
> [as chair]
>
> The adoption and WGLC period for the three documents has ended. Given 
> the expressed support (meager as it was) and lack of objection, we're 
> going to consider the 6665-clarifications draft adopted.
>
> There were no additional comments on refer-clarifications or 
> refer-explicit-subscription, so we will begin preparing them for IESG 
> review.
>
> [as author]
>
> A new version that I believe addresses the outstanding comments on the
>
> 6665 clarification document is available here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification/
>
> Ivo / Brett: as you were the people who provided the feedback that 
> I've incorporated, please look over this latest text to let me know 
> whether it addresses the specific concern that had been raised. Thanks!
>
> /a
>