IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] SIP/websocket: SIP Identity question

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 29 November 2013 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094CD1AE0AF for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bwu1PS9m_BYH for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com (mail-qa0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09281AE0AE for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id o15so1369398qap.10 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x20oBTbkiCWfOgNiCXQnTg8najGrOePyWxJeNrFcjxM=; b=Q9Xgf8rZtgPhHm5nUe5I2v6OhLuSB91/oWneWjeVZBTHD+vpvL2P9p4SzzjVbymv9X sRbYJ8RzyuE+6vmfgIPvaBvrLvorYNzcebMRr9JFiSetvp+Tq6829jkYh8KiD55JCivm O1fYZx53utDch0zz/sW0l4gYWqdOEljYSyNpCyV7ua8gJ/fYvcoCbkxDmF8UXPaP0PUj NnDppchSL09BcRhr5cQB2xd+o4blH9a95LpI4nRY0bf4nePd0MWNf874UFJEywqeEHbV 2esqFbeiqYZPFKwOS80/rvhQKPsJhn4j3/VJ7Q2+nYGvsIeV2CzOi/rbNJ3AD/+KSlqY kuRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8umOe03B7U6vcvmlh+vBcHk9Gujr7ZmR0MEoMF8BFrc1cdablEdCu9D9K/vfgoJFEBryo
X-Received: by 10.49.94.177 with SMTP id dd17mr82016776qeb.14.1385690582435; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.71.8 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:02:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52809E77.6080005@oracle.com>
References: <5264AB70.7000408@oracle.com> <527B1830.30000@oracle.com> <033FDA36-997D-4A72-B26A-979DCEDBC1F3@softarmor.com> <52809E77.6080005@oracle.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 03:02:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfm4tme4PjpvxjNqL=jJ50mSGJXJZRVZqQgwK1Ua4Zm18Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: binod pg <binod.pg@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] SIP/websocket: SIP Identity question
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:03:05 -0000

2013/11/11 binod pg <binod.pg@oracle.com>:
> From  the sip/websocket draft perspective, "MUST" in the following sentence
> is creating the confusion for a reader.
>
> <snip>
>    and MUST validate that the SIP identity in
>    those SIP requests match the SIP identity associated to the WebSocket
>    connection
> </snip>
>
>
> Either the spec should clearly state what the "SIP identity" actually mean
> (see
> the questions below) or if everyone know that the "SIP identity" is broken
> and cannot be used
> consistently, reword the sentence to not mandate the validation.

I agree and such a sentence is removed for the next version of the
draft (to be published in a few minutes).

I've been thinking on it a lot and definitely it makes no sense at all
to assume that there are "webSocket user" and "SIP user", even less
than they "should match".


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email