Re: [sipcore] Dispatching of draft-ivov-dispatch-trickle-ice-sip-00 and draft-ivov-dispatch-sdpfrag

[Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>]

On 2/26/13 11:50 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
> Ok - we'll add them to the MMUSIC agenda. Does any other group need to 
> review these drafts at some point or can they be handled completely by 
> MMUSIC ?
That depends entirely on what the final mechanisms start to look like.

I would make sure SIPCORE stays aware of the things that end up 
transported in SIP, and as the drafts mature, continue to re-assess 
whether pieces of them need to be done in SIPCORE.
> Thanks
>
> -- Flemming
>
> On 2/26/13 5:10 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We had our review of the DISPATCH-86 topics with the ADs this morning.
>>   The decision was to dispatch these documents to the MMUSIC WG for
>> discussion as potential work items:
>> - draft-ivov-dispatch-trickle-ice-sip (currently proposes a new INFO
>> event package)
>> - draft-ivov-dispatch-sdpfrag (defines application/sdpfrag MIME media 
>> type)
>>
>> It made more sense to dispatch to MMUSIC since they are related to
>> draft-ivov-mmusic-trickle-ice-00 which is currently under discussion
>> as a proposed MMUSIC WG document.  And, neither the SIP change nor RFC
>> 6086 require that this sort of work be done in SIPCORE.
>>
>> If you have any questions or comments, please let the ADs know ASAP.
>> I will be posting this decision along with the plans for the other
>> IETF-86 topics and agenda by tomorrow morning.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mary
>> DISPATCH WG co-chair
>> .
>>
>