Re: [sipcore] Declaring SIP 1.0 historic?

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 13 July 2016 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBFF12D188 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1Y3d5kFlK4q for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B9B12D16C for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u6DHgGZ3020951 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:42:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu>, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
References: <1EE2D149-1E1A-49DA-ACB8-625FEC4E4508@edvina.net> <76f2fd5e65bfa393281d682d23e18f11@mail.gmail.com> <C88324E1-C2D4-4E9A-8B99-1D86663074BD@edvina.net> <22406.24552.369096.256493@compute06.cs.columbia.edu>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <d7448204-2483-6dd3-9dec-2327a0bcbb10@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:42:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22406.24552.369096.256493@compute06.cs.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/p4BGfwmzYb1ba4cLQkPPkeTfk7w>
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Declaring SIP 1.0 historic?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:42:37 -0000

On 7/13/16 10:36, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13 2016, "Olle E. Johansson" wrote to "Brett Tate, sipcore@ietf.org, Olle E Johansson" saying:
>
>> Realising I’ve been fooled by folklore I am still searching for version 1.0. Any pointers?
> There never was a SIP/1.0.

That doesn't quite match my memory.

I beleive there were early implementations of Handly/Schooler's SIP/1.0 
spec 
<http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/drafts/mmusic/draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-00.pdf>in 
one or both of the UCL/Caltech labs. This was subsequently merged with 
Schulzrinne's Simple Conference Invitation Protocol (SCIP/1.0) 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-scip-00>, and the merged 
version was dubbed SIP/2.0.

Poking around, this paper's introduction matches my personal 
recollection of the history:

http://www.jocm.us/uploadfile/2013/0416/20130416114634804.pdf

/a