[sipcore] Fwd: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Oops, meant to include working group:

Forwarded message:

> From: Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: AD Evaluation of 
> draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:27:07 -0500
>
> Hi,
>
> This is my AD Evaluation of 
> draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02.
>
> Summary: This is ready for IETF LC. I have a few comments/questions, 
> but nothing that need block the last call.
>
> Substantive Comments:
>
> -- 4.3, 4th paragraph: "... return a 200 response containing ..."
>
> Containing where? This should probably mention Refer-Events-At. If 
> there's other text that says you MUST put it in that header field, I 
> missed it.
>
> -- 6:
>
> Did I miss a prohibition about putting both tags in Require at the 
> same time?
>
> -- 10, last sentence:
>
> Isn’t this redundant to similar text in refer-clarifications? Why 
> does it need to be in both?
>
> -- 8, third paragraph: "... the URI should be constructed so that it 
> is not easy to guess..."
>
> Is this intentionally non-normative? (Seems odd that the following 
> “for instance” about TLS or DTLS _is_ normative but this sentence 
> is not.)
>
> Editorial:
>
> -- 4.3, third paragraph:
>
> s/recieved/received