Re: [sipcore] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 13:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509F1A912A for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-oVTbRw4HYv for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 029691A9111 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t5MDxbr4025073 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:59:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:59:37 -0500
Message-ID: <BE02DE62-34D3-467E-A31D-665AC5393313@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150622094739.29512.78952.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150622094739.29512.78952.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/q_y5-30BkHDds0H0DGEB6Qqiwjk>
Cc: sipcore-chairs@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification.shepherd@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification.ad@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:59:51 -0000
Thanks for your review! I have already put in an RFC Editor note about the incorrect reference. (I will leave it to Adam to address the secdir questions.) Thanks! Ben. On 22 Jun 2015, at 4:47, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00: No Objection [..] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This was probably caught by now, but the introduction says this update > exists because of lack of clarity in RFC2119, when it was meant to say in > RFC6665. > > The SecDir reviewer asked a few clarifying questions that would be good > to see answered: > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05789.html
- [sipcore] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [sipcore] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Ben Campbell