Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 20 March 2017 14:23 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C376131499 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UxZNwSgsSNmg for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A806131497 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.115]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id py9ucmfAc4CjQpyDCcPUgm; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:23:06 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4603:9471:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id pyDAcHsmya1xFpyDBcXvG4; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:23:06 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v2KEN2Vn022969; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:23:02 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v2KEN1ZU022955; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:23:01 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <15aeb1be62a.11b35bf8267637.2121189919710903185@ovsienko.info> (denis@ovsienko.info)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:23:00 -0400
Message-ID: <87o9ww2fjv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKSCUUSaD+JbirTCA7mY+3vOrGqk/ncosy0rt+0sn/YZ0BqMLtTRKYCXIPBlAC2YYB0V9lb/SxANfrJsP7pacpYuSayzcBZobPcg84FV4grij8PHDFpQ UkGUxQvF8JWK9PRKZGI0MyG2uNVCP7hZvwX//liwQOMXzLnJFnOtqww1o/Sq+vA9/agWOvyzzixJc3R/toeiFRZ9EOwifXNS3fU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/uUEqySZ86xCwe_4yo4_TdXFCq3U>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:23:10 -0000
Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info> writes: > If you mind people that take the Bible and its teachings seriously, it > will be easy for them to see it as a personal insult if their phone > receives and displays the message as it is proposed, as well as if > their phone sends such a message on their behalf. This is not specific > to SIP, the same conflict may be caused by a snail mail post, except > in real-time communications people have less time to think and step > back from the situation. That seems to be a valid consideration to me: Embedding culturally/religiously/politically symbolic identifiers in a protocol in a way that end users will at least occasionally see is probably not a good idea. It's clear even to me that a flippant reference to the Prophet is asking for trouble, and it seems like we should take references to the Number of the Beast seriously, given its long history as a politically powerful symbol. > As an additional consideration, the document implies that the user > receiving the "unwanted" call has a good reason and the user placing > the call does not have it, as in spam calls. I'm not current on the document, but my understanding is that it makes clear that the response code is *in the opinion of the recipient* and must be interpreted as such. And indeed, that the recipient may have triggered the response accidentally. > Besides the end users, there is the technical audience, both inside > and outside of IETF. This audience expects a certain level of > professionalism from IETF Standard Track publications. By not meeting > those expectations this publication would disappoint the engineers too > and lower their motivation to contribute. Simply put, the number of > people that think "IETF has less respect to its intended audience than > I used to think. They don't make Internet better, they are > whim-driven, now that I know it, I better stay away." will > increase. And they will actually stay away regardless if things > improve afterwards. I think the evidence is that seriousness is not required to attract technical talent to the IETF. (See RFCs 439, 527, 748, 968, 1097, 1149, 1216, 1217, 1313, 1437, 1438, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1776, 1882, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 2100, 2321, 2322, 2323, 2324, 2325, 2410, 2549, 2550, 2551, 2795, 3091, 3092, 3093, 3251, 3252, 3514, 3751, 4041, 4042, 4824, 5241, 5242, 5513, 5514, 5841, 5984, 6214, 6217, 6592, 6593, 6919, 6921, 7168, 7169, 7511, and 7514.) However, there might be a public relations problem concerning management, politicians, etc. Dale
- [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-u… The IESG
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Denis Ovsienko
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Pete Resnick
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Ranjit Avasarala
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Pete Resnick
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Alan Johnston
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Pete Resnick
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Asveren, Tolga
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Pete Resnick
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Souma Badombena
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-stat… Asveren, Tolga