IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Happy Eyeballs for SIP / Summa Beatitudinem

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Sun, 18 December 2016 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D1412947D for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:32:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ZI35KE_DRfm for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [212.3.14.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3E2129515 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:32:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.40.18] (h87-96-134-129.cust.se.alltele.net [87.96.134.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFB356C38; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:32:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB2342238C90A7F9D3AC291AC1B29E0@CO2PR03MB2342.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:32:02 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86BDF0AB-DA41-4C83-8D1D-56EC8FE46C02@edvina.net>
References: <CO2PR03MB2342238C90A7F9D3AC291AC1B29E0@CO2PR03MB2342.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/v0iaSFdosESivuyc0wQd6UwjaiU>
Cc: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Happy Eyeballs for SIP / Summa Beatitudinem
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:32:19 -0000

> On 18 Dec 2016, at 14:49, Asveren, Tolga <tasveren@sonusnet.com> wrote:
> 
> B) Use of Multiple Interfaces
> v- I think the ideal place to cover this would be RFC6555-bis (also by considering other restrictions as mentioned in ii- above). I wouldn't think that there would be a need for defining anything new in draft-worley-sip-he-connection-00 (?).

A question here is how this works with SIP outbound - do we need two outbound connections per interface? How do we handle
reg-id and failover in that case?

It’s like inventing ICE for SIP… :-)

/O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email