Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location conveyance
Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Mon, 22 June 2009 20:20 UTC
Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4793A6B89 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXWR-IqtYt33 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11E23A67C0 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.102] (cpe-76-182-198-42.tx.res.rr.com [76.182.198.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5MKL61P028176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:21:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4A3FE7AD.4040901@softarmor.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:21:01 -0500
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <4A3E74C7.9050403@ericsson.com> <4A3FC668.4040405@softarmor.com> <XFE-SJC-212rK0pWHIt0000277a@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-212rK0pWHIt0000277a@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location conveyance
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:20:54 -0000
James M. Polk wrote: > At 12:59 PM 6/22/2009, Dean Willis wrote: >> I object to the milestone. This isn't maintenance on the core SIP >> protocol. > > > neither is any of these: > >> To: draft-ietf-sip-199@tools.ietf.org, >> draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance@tools.ietf.org, >> draft-ietf-sip-sec-flows@tools.ietf.org, >> draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements@tools.ietf.org, >> draft-ietf-sip-info-events@tools.ietf.org, >> draft-ietf-sipcore-subnot-etags@tools.ietf.org > > > yet they are also in the SIPCORE WG - as legacy items that are supposed > to be really close to getting done. I believe once these are done, > nothing else is to go into SIPCORE other than SIP maintenance stuff > (like 3265bis). Yep. That's the plan. I just don't like it very much. As a self appointed grouchy old man, it's my privilege to whine about it between flea-scratching sessions, and the fleas have been vicious this year so I'm way behind on my whining. I hope to do some catching-up this week. -- Dean
- [sipcore] Call for consensus: location conveyance Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location convey… Dean Willis
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location convey… James M. Polk
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location convey… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: location convey… Dean Willis