IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipping] Alternate CLF syntax proposal

Vijay Gurbani <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 02 April 2009 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F943A6AF9 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qnb4cQMbCeXl for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E623A6C31 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-61.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n324Jb9C023334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:19:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (guard.research.bell-labs.com [135.104.2.9]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id n324Jahr005165; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:19:37 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <49D43CDB.50404@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:19:39 -0500
From: Vijay Gurbani <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hisham Khartabil <hisham.khartabil@gmail.com>
References: <49CAE21C.5060309@nostrum.com> <49CAEF3B.40309@alcatel-lucent.com> <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC314FEBFF676@mail> <66cd252f0904011842l6c2d971by4985a3f2f8bc5366@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <66cd252f0904011842l6c2d971by4985a3f2f8bc5366@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms070103070409090900040203"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: sipping WG <sipping@ietf.org>, "draft-gurbani-sipping-clf@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gurbani-sipping-clf@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] Alternate CLF syntax proposal
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:19:49 -0000

Hisham Khartabil wrote:
> Yeah, its for troubleshooting, but I suspect people will use it for charging.

I suppose people could use it for whatever purposes they deem
necessary -- I don't think we can stop them.  However, the
draft expressly notes that the CLF format is not a replacement
for a CDR system.  Now, if people will use it as such, then at least
they've been duly notified.

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email