[Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15.txt: clarification
"Franz Edler" <franz.edler@inode.at> Tue, 07 October 2008 18:58 UTC
Return-Path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipping-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sipping-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DDC3A699D; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916593A699D for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaRGTIoN3fwK for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailbackup.inode.at (mailbackup.inode.at [213.229.60.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C93A68BE for <sipping@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [62.99.145.10] (port=14247 helo=mx.inode.at) by mailbackup.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <franz.edler@inode.at>) id 1KnDJn-00057v-Td for sipping@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:13:43 +0200
Received: from [85.127.217.158] (port=9430 helo=notebook) by smartmx-10.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1KnDJT-00042X-Hs for sipping@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:13:23 +0200
From: Franz Edler <franz.edler@inode.at>
To: sipping@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:13:20 +0200
Organization: Franz Edler
Message-ID: <9AE39E8302D649D59E8E865B353F9C41@notebook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Thread-Index: AckohtoUVfYxMNE/R2SDmI3rFWNQ/Q==
Subject: [Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15.txt: clarification
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: franz.edler@inode.at
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all, when looking at the flows in draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15.txt I found an inconstancy in "2.17 Automatic Redial" - at least from my view. My finding: The explicit termination of the subscription by Alice in the end is unnecessary because RFC 4235 states in 3.4: ... when a subscriber is interested in the state of a specific dialog or dialogs (...). In that case, when the dialogs terminate, so too does the subscription. Therefore the explicit termination of the subscription is superfluous. What do you think? Regards Franz _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- [Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15.… Franz Edler
- Re: [Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples… Alan Johnston