Re: [Sipping] WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01
Sriram Parameswar <Sriram.Parameswar@microsoft.com> Fri, 19 September 2008 07:51 UTC
Return-Path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipping-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sipping-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8586E3A68C3; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B8D3A68C3 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNC7bgnkaNRG for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.exchange.microsoft.com (mail1.exchange.microsoft.com [131.107.1.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC23B3A6898 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from df-bhd-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.71.155) by DF-GWY-05.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:34 -0700
Received: from DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.10]) by df-bhd-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.155]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:33 -0700
From: Sriram Parameswar <Sriram.Parameswar@microsoft.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>, "avshalom@il.ibm.com" <avshalom@il.ibm.com>, "aoki@aol.net" <aoki@aol.net>, "vs2140@cs.columbia.edu" <vs2140@cs.columbia.edu>, "hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu" <hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:51:01 -0700
Thread-Topic: WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01
Thread-Index: AckOA3OIgHy3A0CoRbWt2tW8hK9LzAMKCzxQ
Message-ID: <C916C5C17067EA4A93577D163338D13701629DE94B36@DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <48BEF2B9.7050707@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <48BEF2B9.7050707@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sipping <sipping@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Vijay, Thank you for taking the time to review the document. I will work with the co-authors to make the necessary edits and submit at the earliest. Regards, Sriram Parameswar -----Original Message----- From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:25 PM To: avshalom@il.ibm.com; Sriram Parameswar; aoki@aol.net; vs2140@cs.columbia.edu; hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo; Mary Barnes; sipping Subject: WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01 Draft: draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Sept-03-2008 Review Deadline: Sept-03-2008 Status: WGLC Review summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. I had reviewed -00 version of this draft (thread archived at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg15465.html). -01 version addresses a majority of comments in -00. The ones below are pertinent to -01. - REQ-009: I still do not like the vague "tens of millions of concurrent users" (the reasons for this are in -00.) It may be better to rephrase this sentence thus: The solution MUST be scalable (note: we view scalability on the order of tens of millions of users instead of tens of thousands.) - REQ-010: The suggested rewrite is better than the text in -00. Some nits on the new text: s/will be coming from/will be from/ s/watchers form the/watchers from the/ - Section 4, third paragraph: I still believe that the phrase "The IETF sometimes does not give the right priority to actual deployments when designing a protocol" is an opinion that really does not contribute to the discussion at hand. You could convey the same meaning without imparting a judgmental tone by slightly rewording as follows: OLD: It seems that we need to think about the problem in a different way. We need to think about scalability as part of the protocol design. The IETF sometimes does not give the right priority to actual deployments when designing a protocol but in this case it seems that if we do not think about scalability with the protocol design it will be very hard to scale. NEW: Adequate care is must be taken in addressing scalability as part of the initial protocol design; efforts at an attempt to shoehorn scalability at a later date will be doomed to failure. IMHO, the above is just as critical without being overtly judgmental. - S4, last paragraph at end of page 5: s/method is negotiating media/method negotiates media/ Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- [Sipping] WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-prese… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Sipping] WGLC review of draft-ietf-sipping-p… Sriram Parameswar