RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 303?
Rajesh Ramanathan <rajeshra@exchange.microsoft.com> Tue, 07 November 2006 00:23 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhEk1-000385-Sx; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:23:01 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhEk0-00037H-F4 for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:23:00 -0500
Received: from mail1.exchange.microsoft.com ([131.107.1.17] helo=mail.exchange.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhEjw-0000ot-VX for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:23:00 -0500
Received: from DF-BHD-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.63.169) by DF-GWY-05.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.63.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.685.10; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:22:56 -0800
Received: from DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.8]) by DF-BHD-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.63.169]) with mapi; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:22:56 -0800
From: Rajesh Ramanathan <rajeshra@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: "Drage, Keith (Keith)" <drage@lucent.com>, "sipping@ietf.org" <sipping@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:22:00 -0800
Subject: RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 303?
Thread-Topic: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 303?
Thread-Index: AccB0508HgT+hbg4QlOaNWMlXS6zmAAF0z5gAAU8BqA=
Message-ID: <DC3E2D9FA4974341A4EAF3540781DFDB53DEA0D657@DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918072B80C@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918072B80C@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Cc:
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Thanks for the comments. I will work on making the drafts more clear. -----Original Message----- From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@lucent.com] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 1:41 PM To: Rajesh Ramanathan; sipping@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 303? Well, I know these are only response codes, but they do seem to be a bit thin on motivation. Perhaps if you look at RFC 4485 you will see some instructions for formatting SIP specifying drafts, which tells you the structure of the document and what sections are required. You may also want to look at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-03.txt As an example of a completed draft that defines a new response code. Note that while these documents should stay in SIPPING until you have convinced people of the need for these response codes, it will eventually have to transfer to SIP to be progressed. See also mail I sent earlier today on when the number should be assigned to response codes. Finally in several places you have statements that say things like: The 605 looks identical to the 603 in all respects, except that the response code has a very special meaning for the proxy. Proxys that do not support 605 are expected to treat this as a 603 and send the response all the back to the client. Rather any entity that does not implement these extensions will default to RFC 3261 behaviour which in proxy case is to pass on, and in UA case is to treat as the X00 response code when XYY is received. Regards Keith ________________________________ From: Rajesh Ramanathan [mailto:rajeshra@exchange.microsoft.com] Sent: 06 November 2006 18:45 To: sipping@ietf.org Subject: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 303? Hi all, I haven't seen any comments on the following two drafts that were submitted some time ago. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipping/draft-rajesh-sipping-605-00.txt http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipping/draft-rajesh-sipping-303-00.txt Anyone have comments/feedback on this? Thanks Rajesh Ramanathan Microsoft Corporation _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Elwell, John
- [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 605, 3… Rajesh Ramanathan
- RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Rajesh Ramanathan
- RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Rajesh Ramanathan
- RE: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sipping] Comments on new Sipping drafts - 60… Jonathan Rosenberg