[Sipping] call flow
<aditya.padhy@wipro.com> Thu, 03 July 2008 08:25 UTC
Return-Path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipping-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sipping-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7379E3A6874; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF93A6874 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFIPMkRmR+wB for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wipro-blr-out01.wipro.com (wipro-blr-out01.wipro.com [203.91.198.74]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15DE3A681D for <sipping@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: cb5bdd57-a8987bb000001297-12-486c8cf60abf
Received: from blr-ec-aa01.wipro.com (unknown [10.201.18.41]) by wipro-blr-out01.wipro.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id AFF4E4E4004 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:55:26 +0530 (IST)
Received: from blr-ec-bh01.wipro.com ([10.201.50.91]) by blr-ec-aa01.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:55:05 +0530
Received: from blr-ec-bh03.wipro.com ([10.201.50.97]) by blr-ec-bh01.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:55:05 +0530
Received: from chn-snr-bh2.wipro.com ([10.145.50.92]) by blr-ec-bh03.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:55:05 +0530
Received: from CHN-SNR-MBX02.wipro.com ([10.145.50.183]) by chn-snr-bh2.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:54:50 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:53:44 +0530
Message-ID: <7F68A0553127D0498DF130522B541DF1032F7E50@CHN-SNR-MBX02.wipro.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: call flow
thread-index: Acjc5huEdMYXuI4zSauZC838wk1uaA==
From: aditya.padhy@wipro.com
To: sipping@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jul 2008 08:24:50.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[42DE8FD0:01C8DCE6]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Sipping] call flow
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/sipping>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2108375794=="
Sender: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Hi All,
I want to know the difference between sip call flows for a
incoming call and an inactive call.
Does incoming call means call is in ringing state?
What does 'inactive call open' means?
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Kumar Padhy
____________________________
|Wipro Technologies | Extn-41645 |
|ESN-6-877-7331 |Mob-919962633145 |
_______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- [Sipping] call flow aditya.padhy
- Re: [Sipping] call flow sreerekha.shenoy