RE: [Sipping] draft-holmberg-sipping-199-00.txt

Hi Christer,

Can you explain why this is different/better than the proposed 130 error

response code?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahy-sipping-herfp-fix-01

It seems to me that the 199 proposal does not address some of the issues
that
the 130 header addresses. For example, because 130 carries the value of
the
original non-200 final response, it allows the UAC to take proper action
if
required. For example, if it includes a value indicating a failure that
can
be corrected, the UA may re-initiate the call.

________________________________

	From: Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
[mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 02:30
	To: IETF Sipping List
	Cc: Paul Kyzivat
	Subject: [Sipping] draft-holmberg-sipping-199-00.txt

	Hi, 

	I've put together the first version of the 199 response code
draft, based on my initial idea and the discussions on the mailing list.
It defines a new response code, which can be used by forking proxies to
indicate that a specific early dialog has been terminated.

	You can find it at:
http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-sipping-199-00.txt
<http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-sipping-199-00.tx
t>  

	Regards, 

	Christer 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP