RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.
"Avasarala Ranjit-A20990" <ranjit@motorola.com> Mon, 07 May 2007 09:09 UTC
Return-path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE2-0001AU-Si; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:46 -0400
Received: from sipping by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE1-00015y-Sq for sipping-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE1-00013p-GN for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.131]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzDz-0001ne-PP for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ranjit@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1178528977!11910041!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.7]
Received: (qmail 12785 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 09:09:37 -0000
Received: from motgate7.mot.com (HELO motgate7.mot.com) (129.188.136.7) by server-9.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 May 2007 09:09:37 -0000
Received: from az33exr03.mot.com ([10.64.251.233]) by motgate7.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id l4799a9J010420 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 02:09:36 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts03 (az10vts03.mot.com [10.64.251.244]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id l4799Z4x016256 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:09:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ZMY16EXM66.ds.mot.com (zmy16exm66.ap.mot.com [10.179.4.26]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l4799XOk016243 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:09:34 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:09:32 +0800
Message-ID: <750BBC72E178114F9DC4872EBFF29A5B041999DA@ZMY16EXM66.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF4A9833FE.D2497A86-ON652572D4.0025DAA3-652572D4.00263885@flextronicssoftware.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sipping] 433 error response format.
Thread-Index: AceQdNa3qgsy+dNIR5m5vyhXOK8p1wAD7A9g
X-Priority: 1
Priority: Urgent
Importance: high
References: <200704291014.l3TAENDo000599@personeta.com> <OF4A9833FE.D2497A86-ON652572D4.0025DAA3-652572D4.00263885@flextronicssoftware.com>
From: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 <ranjit@motorola.com>
To: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com, adi <adi@personeta.com>
X-Vontu: Pass
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 410b68b37343617c6913e76d02180b14
Cc: sipping@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0627442653=="
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Hi If the privacy type indicated is "id", then the From header should contain "anonymous". But since in your case the From header contains a valid name, then I think there is something wrong in the request that is sent to the UA. But a 433 is more applicable to server., not sure of how a UA should behave( as per draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-04.txt). But I think UA could throw a 433 since it will not be able to fulfill the anonymity requirement of calling UA. Regards Ranjit ________________________________ From: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com [mailto:Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:25 PM To: adi Cc: sipping@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. What should be the behavior of an UserAgent when it receives a valid >From header but the Privacy header contains the value "id"/"user". Can the UA throw 433 just with this check. Preethi. "adi" <adi@personeta.com> 04/29/2007 03:44 PM To <Dale.Worley@comcast.net>, <sipping@ietf.org> cc Subject RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. UAS don't need to instruct UAC on retry since the decision on retry is user dependent and the reason to send 433 is because the UAC don't have a way to handle the case (announcements to dial #82 and the number for example to allow normal call without hiding caller information). In some cases of international call the UAC can't identify treatment to the caller. Adi -----Original Message----- From: Dale.Worley@comcast.net [mailto:Dale.Worley@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:27 AM To: sipping@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sipping] 433 error response format. From: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com A UAC receiving a 433 (Anonymity Disallowed) MUST NOT retry the [...] How will the UAS indicate the UAC that it has a desire for the request to be retried. Will this be communicated in some headers like that of Retry-Header. The UAS has no input into the decision by the UAC to retry the request (without anonymity). Dale _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP *********************** Aricent-Private *********************** "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
_______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. adi
- [Sipping] 433 error response format. Preethi.Sadasivan
- RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. Drage, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sipping] 433 error response format. Dale.Worley
- RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. adi
- RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. Preethi.Sadasivan
- RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format. Avasarala Ranjit-A20990