RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.

"Avasarala Ranjit-A20990" <ranjit@motorola.com> Mon, 07 May 2007 09:09 UTC

Return-path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE2-0001AU-Si; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:46 -0400
Received: from sipping by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE1-00015y-Sq for sipping-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzE1-00013p-GN for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.131]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkzDz-0001ne-PP for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 05:09:45 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ranjit@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1178528977!11910041!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.7]
Received: (qmail 12785 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 09:09:37 -0000
Received: from motgate7.mot.com (HELO motgate7.mot.com) (129.188.136.7) by server-9.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 May 2007 09:09:37 -0000
Received: from az33exr03.mot.com ([10.64.251.233]) by motgate7.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id l4799a9J010420 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 02:09:36 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts03 (az10vts03.mot.com [10.64.251.244]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id l4799Z4x016256 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:09:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ZMY16EXM66.ds.mot.com (zmy16exm66.ap.mot.com [10.179.4.26]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l4799XOk016243 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:09:34 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:09:32 +0800
Message-ID: <750BBC72E178114F9DC4872EBFF29A5B041999DA@ZMY16EXM66.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF4A9833FE.D2497A86-ON652572D4.0025DAA3-652572D4.00263885@flextronicssoftware.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sipping] 433 error response format.
Thread-Index: AceQdNa3qgsy+dNIR5m5vyhXOK8p1wAD7A9g
X-Priority: 1
Priority: Urgent
Importance: high
References: <200704291014.l3TAENDo000599@personeta.com> <OF4A9833FE.D2497A86-ON652572D4.0025DAA3-652572D4.00263885@flextronicssoftware.com>
From: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 <ranjit@motorola.com>
To: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com, adi <adi@personeta.com>
X-Vontu: Pass
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 410b68b37343617c6913e76d02180b14
Cc: sipping@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0627442653=="
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org

Hi
 
If the privacy type indicated is "id", then the From header should
contain "anonymous". But since in your case the From header contains a
valid name, then I think there is something wrong in the request that is
sent to the UA. 
 
But a 433 is more applicable to server., not sure of how a UA should
behave( as per draft-ietf-sip-acr-code-04.txt). But I think UA could
throw a 433 since it will not be able to fulfill the anonymity
requirement of calling UA.
 
Regards 
Ranjit 
 

________________________________

From: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com
[mailto:Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:25 PM
To: adi
Cc: sipping@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.






   What should be the behavior of an UserAgent when it receives a valid
>From header 
but the Privacy header contains the value "id"/"user". Can the UA throw
433 just with this 
check. 

Preethi. 




"adi" <adi@personeta.com> 

04/29/2007 03:44 PM 


To
<Dale.Worley@comcast.net>, <sipping@ietf.org> 
cc
Subject
RE: [Sipping] 433 error response format.

	




UAS don't need to instruct UAC on retry since the decision on retry is
user
dependent and the reason to send 433 is because the UAC don't have a way
to
handle the case (announcements to dial #82 and the number for example to
allow normal call without hiding caller information).
In some cases of international call the UAC can't identify treatment to
the
caller.

Adi

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Worley@comcast.net [mailto:Dale.Worley@comcast.net] 
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:27 AM
To: sipping@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sipping] 433 error response format.

  From: Preethi.Sadasivan@aricent.com

     A UAC receiving a 433 (Anonymity Disallowed) MUST NOT retry the
     [...]

  How will the UAS indicate the UAC that it has a desire for the
  request to be retried. Will this be communicated in some headers
  like that of Retry-Header.

The UAS has no input into the decision by the UAC to retry the request
(without anonymity).

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP



_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP



***********************  Aricent-Private   *********************** 
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended
solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or
confidential information and should not be 
circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended.
If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of
this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for 
loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by
this email including damage from virus."

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP