Re: [Sipping] FW: WGLC Review: draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01.txt

[Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

the authors are already working on the comments received from Vijay and 
Hisham. In any case, per my email below, we would like to get an 
additional reviewer for this draft. Any volunteers?

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as you may remember, a while ago, we (i.e., the chairs) asked whether or 
> not we should be publishing this RFC. We got off-list and on-list 
> feedback stating that this draft was important and that we should 
> publish it. However, we did not get any volunteers in addition to Vijay 
> to review this draft (its WGLC ends today).
> 
> We would like to get two additional reviewers for this draft before 
> progressing it further. Note that this is a fairly short draft and that 
> reviewing it should not take long.
> 
> In short, if you think this draft is important, the best way to state 
> your opinion will be to volunteer to review it ;o)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> Mary Barnes wrote:
>> Oops!  I didn't have the right title to get this automatically to the
>> authors.  Please make sure to incldue the right address in posting any
>> comments on this doc (folks will sometimes miss comments if they're only
>> sent to the WG mailing list).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mary. 
>>
>> ______________________________________________ 
>> From: 	Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00)  
>> Sent:	Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:37 PM
>> To:	[e-mail]
>> Cc:	'Gonzalo Camarillo';
>> '[e-mail]'; simple mailing
>> list
>> Subject:	WGLC  Review:
>> draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01.txt
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> This is to announce a Working Group Last Call on the following document
>> to be published as Informational:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-
>> requirements-01.txt
>>
>> The review period will end on 3 Sept 2008 (3 weeks time). 
>>
>> Note that I have cross-posted to the SIMPLE WG, but ask that you please
>> send your comments only to the SIPPING WG mailing list and authors.
>>
>> At this point we only have one reviewer that has volunteered:  Vijay
>> Gurbani
>> We need at least two others and a presence expert (per RAI review
>> process). 
>>
>> And, we do encourage others to review and make any final comments on the
>> document at this time (including the very useful "Ready" comment). 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mary
>> SIPPING WG co-chair
>>
>> As a reminder, the SIPPING WG review guidelines are available at:
>> https://softarmor.com/sipping/process/wg-review/sipping-review-guideline
>> s.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
>> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
>> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
>> Use [e-mail] for new developments of core SIP
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> Use [e-mail] for new developments of core SIP
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments of core SIP