Re: [Sipping] Re: Comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Wed, 01 November 2006 19:42 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfLzE-0004gp-Hv; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:42:56 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfLzD-0004gk-0K for sipping@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:42:55 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfLz8-0002lH-JQ for sipping@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:42:54 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2006 11:42:50 -0800
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA1Jgo2v024796; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:42:50 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kA1JgnDO008779; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:42:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:42:49 -0500
Received: from [161.44.79.182] ([161.44.79.182]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:42:49 -0500
Message-ID: <4548F8B8.1060208@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:42:48 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] Re: Comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00.txt
References: <4547A4D0.2060704@ericsson.com> <4548EB16.1090208@estacado.net>
In-Reply-To: <4548EB16.1090208@estacado.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2006 19:42:49.0371 (UTC) FILETIME=[E987DEB0:01C6FDED]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1865; t=1162410170; x=1163274170; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=pkyzivat@cisco.com; z=From:Paul=20Kyzivat=20<pkyzivat@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Sipping]=20Re=3A=20Comments=20on=20draft-roach-sipping-callcomp -bfcp-00.txt |To:Adam=20Roach=20<adam@estacado.net>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DzwHl5QURPj23GW/7RZxaQ3IPB4E=3D; b=W0kByy/8/aH5QBHaFFasvnor4kuI/f+mhXT7cQsR4I0Rv0rKrpNJaQ7Bp1bapvSo9XB/T3gK hh+NNat18JIk2p2pdgi8uu+gLcwbHonUfRnyUj5JUO6b260X5uXK1SAP;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=pkyzivat@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: sipping <sipping@ietf.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org


Adam Roach wrote:
> Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> a few comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00.txt.
>>
>> The draft proposes to to establish a SIP session for the BFCP
>> connection. Once the floor is grated, the callee establishes another SIP
>> session for the actual call.
>>
>> The draft should explain how the callee correlates both SIP sessions.
>> That is, how does the callee know that the user calling is the same one
>> as got the floor. The draft should deal with such correlations for
>> anonymous callers as well, where the caller's identity will not be
>> available for the correlation.
> 
> The intention is that the GRID on the GRUU that the caller uses to 
> complete the call will uniquely identify the caller with regards to the 
> CCBS service. (That is, it can't be used to necessarily identify them, 
> but it does correlate them).

However grid is now gone from gruu. Equivalent functionality, using UA 
loose routing, is intended to come back sometime, but no doubt it will 
be somewhat later. (Maybe a lot later.)

	Paul

>> A question: the draft talks about the establishment of one or more BFCP
>> sessions. What do you have in mind? In which cases would UAs establish
>> more than one BFCP session?
> 
> That paragraph could be made clearer. The intention is: if the INVITE 
> forks to, say, three terminals (all of which support call completion), 
> then the calling party will set up three BFCP sessions (one with each 
> terminal) for the call completion service.
> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP