Re: [Sipping] Design meeting for draft-ietf-sipping-[profiles]

[Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>]

works for me :-)

That's the fun of doing this for so many years - we get to do it all  
several times :-)


On Mar 24, 2009, at 14:37 , Daniel Petrie wrote:

>
> If I recall, we already brought this issue up a few years ago.   
> Which is why I converted the profile drafts to use relax NG.
>
> --- On Tue, 3/24/09, Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> > From: Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: Re: Design meeting for draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework
> > To: "Dale Worley" <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: "Gonzalo Camarillo" <[e-mail]>, "Mary  
> Barnes" <[e-mail]>, "Martin Dolly" <[e-mail]>,  
> "Sumanth Channabasappa" <[e-mail]>, "Sam Ganesan" <[e-mail] 
> >, "Volker Hilt" <[e-mail]>, "Daniel Petrie" <[e-mail] 
> >, "Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen)" <[e-mail]>, "John-Luc  
> Bakker" <[e-mail]>, "Andrew Hutton" <[e-mail] 
> >, [e-mail], [e-mail], "Francois Audet" <[e-mail] 
> >, [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] 
> , "Josh Littlefield (joshl)" <[e-mail]>, "SIP Forum UA- 
> Configuration Group" <[e-mail]>, "SIPPING" <[e-mail] 
> >
> > Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 4:56 PM
> >
> > On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:29 , Dale Worley wrote:
> >
> > > --- Schema language to specify data ranges, i.e., XML
> > Schema Language
> > > vs. Relax NG.  But note that Relax NG seems to
> > delegate atomic types to
> > > XML Schema Language.
> >
> > Either can work here but what we choose here will more or
> > less set what we have to use for all the config data. It's
> > seem to me that most the XML experts that work with both
> > strongly prefer relax NG so I would go that way.
> >
> > Cullen <with my individual contributor hat on>
> >
> >