[Sipping] Re: Belated Re-review of consent FW documents in SIPPING

Hi Ben,

thanks for the follow up.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Ben Campbell wrote:
> This is probably too late to matter. Apologies for lateness. 
> Fortunately, my re-review of both consent-format and pending-additions 
> result in the following statement:
> 
> My WGLC feedback for these docs has been addressed and I have no further 
> issues.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: "Mary Barnes" <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
>> Date: March 2, 2007 8:25:31 PM GMT+01:00
>> To: <ben@estacado.net>
>> Subject: Re-review of consent FW documents in SIPPING
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> These documents have been updated since your review in October.  Could 
>> you possibly re-review and make sure that your concerns were 
>> addressed, since this is getting ready to be forwarded to IESG?
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-01.txt 
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format-01.txt 
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mary
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP