[Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-location-requirements-00

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Fri, 13 February 2004 23:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA13422 for <sipping-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:10:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArmRJ-0001un-RZ for sipping-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:41 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1DN9fNI007357 for sipping-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArmRJ-0001ua-Nu for sipping-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:41 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA13355 for <sipping-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmRG-0007BN-00 for sipping-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:38 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmQD-00074G-00 for sipping-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:08:34 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmPl-0006y5-00 for sipping-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:08:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArmPi-0001Ma-0A; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:08:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArmOz-000122-8l for sipping@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:07:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA13099 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:07:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmOw-0006wf-00 for sipping@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:07:14 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmO1-0006tj-00 for sipping@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:06:18 -0500
Received: from cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.16.20]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArmNc-0006qY-00 for sipping@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:05:52 -0500
Received: from magnum.cs.columbia.edu (IDENT:root@magnum.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.117]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1DN5qR4002036 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:05:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (dhcp62.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.17.212]) by magnum.cs.columbia.edu (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i1DN5qH09417 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:05:52 -0500
Message-ID: <402D584C.6050103@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:05:48 -0500
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sipping@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Sipping] draft-ietf-sipping-location-requirements-00
Sender: sipping-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: SIPPING Working Group (applications of SIP) <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think it would be helpful to do a back-of-the-envelope calculation for 
a typical message exchange and geo value as to what delay a reasonable 
(GPRS, say) wireless channel would impose for the case that the proxy 
provides location information.

My back-of-a-grocery-bag calculation (even rougher than 
back-of-the-envelope) is:

100 kb/s data rate (optimistic)
10000 bit per message with location information

= 100 ms per transit of a location object across the air interface.

In the proxy-provides-location case, we'd need roughly 3 messages 
(INVITE-redirect-INVITE), two of which have location information, for a 
total of 300 ms, not counting the TLS setup time (which may or may not 
be required for each emergency call). This is close enough to the E-1 
requirement limit that somewhat more precise calculations are called for.

I also found it peculiar that the draft does not mention the 
signature-only (unencrypted) mode for S/MIME, which would not interfere 
with proxy inspection. (The chain of reasoning should probably be: need 
privacy + can't use S/MIME for privacy since proxies need to peek -> 
TLS, rather than the current non-sequitur.)

Henning

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP