Re: [Sipping] typo in draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-05 ??

Takuya Sawada <tu-sawada@kddi.com> Tue, 26 February 2008 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sipping-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sipping-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72ADF28C94B; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:21:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.296, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3P9YLAVfisqN; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B60D3A6EC8; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:09:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipping@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4530C3A6EC5 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:09:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8A01mkSprEi3 for <sipping@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from UTMC1103.kddi.com (athena.kddi.com [210.141.112.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FBF28CA97 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from UTMC1135 (unknown [10.5.16.204]) by UTMC1103.kddi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD6F92C45; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:02:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.kddi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 148681BCD; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:02:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: from UTMC1118.kddi.com (unknown [10.5.16.33]) by UTMC1124.kddi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986BE1BEB; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:02:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: from KDDI-0403PC0002 ([10.200.211.248] [10.200.211.248]) by post-ims.kddi.com with ESMTPA; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:02:16 +0900
To: brett@broadsoft.com, zhengyli@cisco.com, sipping@ietf.org
From: Takuya Sawada <tu-sawada@kddi.com>
References: <F86B91A10B14744E88408E80B8A30EF302AE2383@xmb-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com> <BBE61D1553D8A34F812FF87377B2935F02973476@ATL1VEXC020.usdom003.tco.tc>
In-Reply-To: <BBE61D1553D8A34F812FF87377B2935F02973476@ATL1VEXC020.usdom003.tco.tc>
Message-Id: <200802261002.GCB17741.tXUBTVEBB@kddi.com>
X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.50]
X-Accept-Language: ja,en
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:02:16 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-WAuditID: 0802261002230000526122
Subject: Re: [Sipping] typo in draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-05 ??
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org

> 
> Yes; discussed within the following link: 
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg15033.html
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg15037.html>  
>  
Yes. But I forgot to update it in the latest version (-06).
It's my mistake.

This will be fixed anyway.
Thanks.

Regards,
Takuya

> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: sipping-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipping-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Rockson Li (zhengyli)
> 	Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:32 AM
> 	To: sipping@ietf.org
> 	Subject: [Sipping] typo in draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-05
> ??
> 	
> 	
> 	4.1. Message Crossing Case Handling   
> 
> 	  Therefore, to simplify implementations, a UA acting
> 	  as a UAS for an INVITE transaction is recommended not to defer
> 	  sending an UPDATE request with an offer until after the
> reliable
> 	  response with an answer to the offer in the INVITE request is
> 	  acknowledged with a PRACK request
> 	 
> 	should "not" in "not to defer" be removed?
> 	 
> 	Thanks
> 
> 	Regards,
> 	Rockson Li
> 	Cisco R&D Center, Shanghai, PRC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> 
> 

--------
Takuya Sawada
KDDI Corporation (KDDI)
Garden Air Tower, 3-10-10, Iidabashi, 
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8460, Japan
Tel: +81-3-6678-2997
Fax: +81-3-6678-0286
tu-sawada@kddi.com

------------------------------------------------------------------
注意:この電子メールには、KDDI株式会社の機密情報が含まれている
      場合が有ります。正式なメール受信者でない場合、メール複製、
   再配信または情報の使用を固く禁じております。
      エラー、手違い等でこのメールを受け取られましたら、お手数を
   おかけ致しますが、削除を行い配信者に連絡をお願い致します。
NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and
   privileged information from KDDI Corporation. If you are
   not the intended recipient, any disclosure, photocopying,
      distribution or use of the contents of the received
      information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail
      in error, please notify the sender immediately and
     permanently delete this message and all related copies.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP