Re: [Sipping] RFC 6157 actually updates RFC 3263 too - dual stack DNS lookups

["Olle E. Johansson" <[e-mail]>]

5 okt 2011 kl. 16:04 skrev Vijay K. Gurbani:

> On 2011/10/3 Olle E. Johansson<[e-mail]> wrote:
>> The clause about a dual-stack user agent clearly doesn't follow RFC
>> 3263, since it implies "and" instead of "or". There's no MUST, SHOULD
>> or MAY language applied here, so it seems like this is an oversight -
>> not that RFC 6157 is wrong, but that there should have been a more
>> clear update to RFC 3263.
> 
> Interesting reading of the tea leaves.
Just noted that MSRP has the same issue. Growing to a tea bush :-)

> 
> One thing you may want to do is to file an errata (see "How to Report
> Errata" at http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html).
> 
> Then, the authors and any verifying parties will deliberate on whether
> or not this is indeed an errata.  This appears to work for errata in
> text, but your claim is that rfc6157 should have updated rfc3263 as
> well, so the change is in the masthead of rfc6157 and not in the text
> itself.
> 
> I suspect that a decision will be made on what to do after an errata
> is filed ...
> 
Ok, will do.

/O