[Sipping] Re: Comment: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-03.txt
"Jani Hautakorpi (JO/LMF)" <jani.hautakorpi@ericsson.com> Fri, 01 June 2007 10:14 UTC
Return-path: <sipping-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu49h-0007MC-K8; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:14:49 -0400
Received: from sipping by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu49g-0007Jy-D7 for sipping-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:14:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu49g-0007Jj-2g for sipping@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:14:48 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu49f-0003ei-AD for sipping@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:14:48 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id ABDEF2056F; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-ae1ebbb0000061ca-71-465ff19677d7
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.122]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 8D5F6201C9; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200FA2356; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:14:46 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965A4DC08; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:14:45 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6084DAE8; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:14:45 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <465FF1AE.4010003@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:15:10 +0300
From: "Jani Hautakorpi (JO/LMF)" <jani.hautakorpi@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Siddhartha Bhakta <sbhakta007@yahoo.co.in>
References: <349910.28227.qm@web8712.mail.in.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <349910.28227.qm@web8712.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2007 10:14:46.0245 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADFA9150:01C7A435]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: bpenfield@acmepacket.com, sipping@ietf.org, Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com
Subject: [Sipping] Re: Comment: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-03.txt
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Siddhartha, Siddhartha Bhakta wrote: > [1] This document mainly talks about the general > practices of SBC and associated architectural issues. > Is there any plan to propose solution(in this draft or > in some other draft) for those architectural issues? I personally hope that there would be solution drafts, which would be based on this draft, in the future. > [2] Sec 3.1.1 > The Path, P-Asserted-Id, P-Preferred-Id etc. should > also be specified in this section. The draft has already gone through the working group last call and its current state is "Publication Requested", so we are not adding text to the draft anymore. > [3] Sec 3.1.1 > "However, in deployments which use IP addresses > instead of domain names in headers that cannot be > removed (e.g. From and To headers), the SBC may > replace these IP addresses with its own IP address or > domain name." > > The TO and FROM header contains the identity of Callee > and Calling party. (Ignore anonymous call for a > moment). Is it justified to manipulate hostport part > of TO & FROM? > I think, it is justified with the explanation below. I > just need others view on it. > As TO and FROM are containing IP addresses, it can be > assumed that hostport part of TO and FROM are > insignificant to identify SIP users. Therefore, > hostport part of TO and FROM can be modified with > SBC's IP address or domain. > > [4] This is an issue for any B2BUA > If SBC needs to terminate any Dialog (due to session > timer expiry etc.), SBC may generate BYE for that. But > if that BYE is challenged then how shall SBC generate > BYE with right credential? To answer your questions [3] and [4]: The idea of the draft is just to describe the commonly provided functions of SBCs and not to specify any particular behavior. So, the draft does not specify what SBCs shall do in scenarios you described. -- Jani _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- [Sipping] Comment: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-0… Siddhartha Bhakta
- [Sipping] Re: Comment: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-fun… Jani Hautakorpi (JO/LMF)
- Re: [Sipping] Re: Comment: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc… Hans Persson