[Sipping] Re: Comment on draft-narayanan-sipping-aaa-diameter-00.txt

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Sun, 15 September 2002 21:29 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11381 for <sipping-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:29:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8FLVEk14279 for sipping-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:31:14 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8FLVDv14276 for <sipping-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:31:13 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11367 for <sipping-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:29:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8FLQtv14208; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:26:55 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8FLL7v14099 for <sipping@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:21:07 -0400
Received: from marionberry.cc.columbia.edu (marionberry.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.100]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11262 for <sipping@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (dclient9.netlab.uky.edu [204.198.76.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by marionberry.cc.columbia.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8FLKjC6023905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D84F954.3080004@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:19:16 -0400
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
CC: abk2001@cs.columbia.edu, sankaran@windows.microsoft.com, sipping@ietf.org
References: <MFEJKLHKCMNFOPKPHMBPCEBDCDAA.fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Sipping] Re: Comment on draft-narayanan-sipping-aaa-diameter-00.txt
Sender: sipping-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: SIPPING Working Group (applications of SIP) <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Cullen Jennings wrote:
> I am very happy to see some work in this area - thanks.

Thanks for your comments.


> I think a better solution would involve a network generated billing id. (ala
> DCS)

Generated by the proxy server that sends the DIAMETER messages?

> 
> Accounting-Input/Output-Octets/Packets serves no purpose I can imagine.

This was motivated by the need to deal with "user-to-user" information 
in SIP messages. There appear to be only two approaches:

- Try to prevent user-to-user signaling by stripping SIP signaling to 
keep SIP from becoming a free (3G) IM / SMS service. In my opinion, 
futile and counterproductive.

- Account for user signaling messages, so that users can be charged if 
they decide to embed their file transfers into headers of the SIP INVITE 
messages.

> 
> I think it would be good to look at the things people are currently
> collecting from SIP and H.323 calls in billing system. Figure out what they
> want to accomplish with this information then figure out a good way to do
> that.

Advice and insights on this would be much appreciated. We want to 
accomplish at least two things:

- gain insight into user SIP message behavior statistics
- session duration accounting

(I won't repeat the usual caveats of using SIP information for the latter.)

> 
> If you are defining some AVP, you might want to make the media ones specific
> to RTP instead of SIP so they can be used by H.323/MGCP/H.248.

We had discussed this and hope to get to that.

> 
> I'd give some thought to what you would need to bill for a call that got
> transferred and what is needed for a conference call.

I'm hoping that a "central mixer" conference call looks similar to a 
point-to-point call. Transfer and redirection is tricky, since there are 
many parties that could be charged, depending on the business model.

> 
> Hope that helps,
> 
> Cullen

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP