Re: [siprec] IETF86 SIPREC F2F Meeting

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Fri, 11 January 2013 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D675F21F8903 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:36:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.952, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kH2UYhAhLiSN for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:36:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849921F8918 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:36:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1276; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1357929413; x=1359139013; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Xwp7g5fW0qMRvWoNA4KPpstg42n7olOjGdqqYzrE+l8=; b=D92ePZZuOnLJRyisnqdGanxdSGwrLUA8ZIpfQQFcvh/+Ayyw8u7bQ/iA c2dwXg+zWpo6jrpRW52hdGtExYvl6L0jv2HzIe0+D3+fKFL9pv33NWh3U jjfaprWw5EmxEcbeuzqb5XeoKGfloQSevJLIQRm5sCaEyphMuJz2vfSyY M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAG1a8FCtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABEvX4Wc4IeAQEBBAEBATc0FwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAQEEARIIiBABDLYeBJBFYQOmVIJ1giQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,453,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="158488961"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2013 18:36:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0BIaqn7026956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:36:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.224]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:36:52 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF86 SIPREC F2F Meeting
Thread-Index: Ac3vHhvpP1mhx5OwQci8qjsKLZXP2ABC6iRw
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:36:51 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882804729014@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF013A7554@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF013A7554@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.16.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [siprec] IETF86 SIPREC F2F Meeting
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:36:57 -0000

Hi Andy,

I expect we will have enough to discuss to warrant a two hour slot.
As for the protocol draft, it would be great to get some close reviews of the complete document, or at least comments on the changes since IETF 85. Ideally this will occur in time for the authors to post an additional update addressing those comments prior to the document submission deadline (Feb 25).

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Hutton, Andrew
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 2:35 AM
> To: siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: [siprec] IETF86 SIPREC F2F Meeting
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have asked for our usual 2 hour slot for SIPREC at IETF86 I assume we will
> need this, any views on this?
> 
> We really need to start moving draft-ietf-siprec-protocol towards a WGLC so
> could we have some volunteers to perform a detailed review on the latest
> updates.
> 
> Also we still need more reviewers for draft-ietf-siprec-metadata and draft-
> ram-siprec-callflows-02 drafts.
> 
> Regards
> Andy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> siprec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec