Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-02 - review

"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Wed, 12 December 2012 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B0A21F8A4B for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:51:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.106
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NDuCo+RcXN+X for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound-us3.mailhostbox.com (unknown [70.87.28.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2666B21F8A45 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.166.141.60]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by outbound-us3.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8744C8687D5; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:51:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1355334685; bh=0Sp+/Hy36KeERGqc1WIXaZ1czdYw4qPRtmvfYzD4eoU=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cn0J/aM011a1UCsVlq4tV02tnRxjNDqSsNcFI7Ow8m4iBw5/psjSlEtpJo+nMQ+VO iY5BbWyq8MV+kuFX/PWLy/p7C4qC8Vt/yMrOV9RpVEH4Gj17O1P4iOO1V5A/dXYKkw D6Ln+B8lMYJSWDemt5z0TslzFF7hzrY0cQbxFf0c=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Ofir Roth' <Ofir.Roth@nice.com>, siprec@ietf.org
References: <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8DFA7B68@TLVMBX01.nice.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6FF53BFD24F6F448C70DEF68DB4E6655A8DFA7B68@TLVMBX01.nice.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:21:18 +0530
Message-ID: <001e01cdd891$4c182240$e44866c0$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01CDD8BF.65D05E40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac3CYSm52tsPv4kmSliQkSP55TZcVwWL6OLg
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0203.50C8C41D.001E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
Subject: Re: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-02 - review
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:51:54 -0000

Hi Ofir,

 

Sorry for the delay response. Thanks a lot for your detailed review.

 

All your reviews comments in the below are accepted and the proposed changes
in the comments will be incorporated in the next revision.

 

Please let us know any other comments in the callflow.

 

Thanks

Partha

 

From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ofir Roth
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:00 PM
To: siprec@ietf.org
Subject: [siprec] draft-ram-siprec-callflows-02 - review

 

Hi,

 

I have reviewed "draft-ram-siprec-callflows-02" and have some comments: 

 

1.       dataMode element name is not compliant with metadata schema V8/9 -
should be datamode.

2.       Participantsessionassoc in the initial metadata (simple call) is
missing session ID (the same for the first transfer scenario).

3.       Section 3.3/resume - " The snapshot will look pretty much same as
above with just the SDP" - metadata should also include two of the "send"
streams (audio/video) to indicate that the streams are open on both channels
and not only SDP change as stated above (similar to the initial complete
metadata snapshot).

4.       Section 3.6 - the last stream is redundant
(EiXGlc+4TruqqoDaNE76ag==) - not in use and can be removed from the
metadata.

 

Thanks,
Ofir.