IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [skex] Way-Ahead Options

"Panwei (William)" <william.panwei@huawei.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <william.panwei@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: skex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: skex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A626C14F6AF for <skex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35fWVhW3_eHm for <skex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334ABC14F694 for <skex@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V8Zx70ZLXz67G9v; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:44:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.219]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99CAF140B73; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:45:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:45:58 +0100
Received: from kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.191) by kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:45:56 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.191]) by kwepemi500010.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.191]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:45:56 +0800
From: "Panwei (William)" <william.panwei@huawei.com>
To: Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>, "skex@ietf.org" <skex@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [skex] Way-Ahead Options
Thread-Index: AQHahTEVQXNcf5sF8kKd4CjBcZEzy7FWGPig
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:45:56 +0000
Message-ID: <edd4969b6e7c4b56a80bed93a8b9a0d0@huawei.com>
References: <CAL96d56eaCU8YEMJtjn7U5xkVUKuTg---F=EEcKW8CrsdS+-bQ@mail.gmail.com> <17460c0e-83b3-4739-8d18-07fd02bd4337@huitema.net> <375326.1711331613@dyas> <777550E4-7860-4573-A37D-453A9ABA24D2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <777550E4-7860-4573-A37D-453A9ABA24D2@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.164.106.141]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/skex/UpXp1bOhnbM7ijWm4p3RQ764VoI>
Subject: Re: [skex] Way-Ahead Options
X-BeenThere: skex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Symmetric Key Exchange <skex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/skex>, <mailto:skex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/skex/>
List-Post: <mailto:skex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:skex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/skex>, <mailto:skex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:46:07 -0000

Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com> wrote:
    > In my mind, draft charter text is not the top priority, but others
    > might differ.  My own sense is that instead the priority should be
    > rough draft I-Ds which cover (a) Use Cases and (b) Requirements.
    > Without candidate Use Cases and candidate Requirements, I doubt a
    > formal BoF would be approved by the Powers That Be.

+1. Totally agree.

Regards & Thanks！
Wei PAN (潘伟)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status