Re: [Slim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-14.txt

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

At 3:15 PM +0200 10/13/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote:

>  Thanks Randall, good to see progress.
>
>  Apart from the comments I made to the separate 
> issues, I also noticed that you without reason 
> deleted this sentence from the introduction.
>
>  "Note that separate work may introduce additional information
>  regarding language/modality preferences among media."
>
>  The separate work is going on, and it is not related to the asterisk anymore.

Hi Gunnar,

The text was added, along with an informative 
reference to your draft, to explain that the 
asterisk was an interim measure and that other 
work was extending it.  With the deletion of the 
asterisk, there isn't a need to mention your 
documents in this one.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The militarization of the rhetoric supporting the war on drugs rots
the public debate with a corrosive silence.  The political weather
turns gray and pinched.  People who become accustomed to the
arbitrary intrusions of the police also learn to speak more softly
in the presence of political authority, to bow and smile and fill
out the printed forms with cowed obsequiousness of musicians
playing waltzes at a Mafia wedding.
     --Lewis Lapham, "A Political Opiate" (Harper's, December 1989)