Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP
"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Wed, 19 September 2012 18:33 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F8121E8043 for <smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.975, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhpGA84tFQ6n for <smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy7.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E39DD21E809E for <smartobjectdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24771 invoked by uid 0); 19 Sep 2012 18:33:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2012 18:33:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From; bh=j6c9g1m+9sqk9Mii/itXR+q3BQTPaw55r9keNpek6gE=; b=d+8wiw3HKCsr0eSseMuI9Zzgpf4BXCWOFzt+MlrkT9+ERcwKkC7x40gcvxzVTRjkjByKTmwroMZkCWFZbRLr94jxm2nGNjD+S0jJCIMMC4nkS/CVw6yGieV4Xho7IUm2;
Received: from [71.191.243.130] (port=49442 helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1TEP53-0001e8-RL; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:33:02 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: 'Vint Cerf' <vint@google.com>, "'Fred Baker (fred)'" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <D8656EDE-1D31-4523-9657-B66AEAC23019@cisco.com> <CAHxHggeog1bcMSscj53=Nqy-5Um-DtaG9W08ituMhGj8LqOOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHxHggeog1bcMSscj53=Nqy-5Um-DtaG9W08ituMhGj8LqOOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:32:58 -0400
Message-ID: <005901cd9695$32e05ab0$98a11010$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01CD9673.ABCEBAB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac2WkzIwdqYEdaCfS/y84RBJiz1zMQAAaOZA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.191.243.130 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Cc: 'IETF SmartObjectDir' <smartobjectdir@ietf.org>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP
X-BeenThere: smartobjectdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <smartobjectdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartobjectdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:33:11 -0000
+1 Do the regulators have to pay as well? J It's a very insular industry. From: smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vint Cerf Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:19 PM To: Fred Baker (fred) Cc: IETF SmartObjectDir; Russ Housley Subject: Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP +1 On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: I'm reporting on recent events in the Smart Grid Interoperability Panel. SGIP continues doing what it does, which is reviewing standards from a variety of bodies but mostly IEC, for their place in the Smart Grid. They're mostly happy with IETF standards and plan to use them. The past four years have been an educational process on my part, mostly trying to ensure that wherever they can use IPv4, they can also use IPv6. I have written one RFC at their request, and inserted an IPv6-related comment into one IEC specification-in-development. Communications is not their primary interest; most specifications that deal with communications at all, such as RFC 6142, specify it down to what is referred to as the "ISO Transport API", by which they mean RFC 2126. For the most part, it is normalization of what we might call MIBs and object models and working out the details of business-to-business exchanges at the application layer. SGIP has been funded by ARRA money - the ~$800B initiative to "get America working" with "shovel-ready" projects in 2009. In ARRA, about $28B was set aside for grid modernization, and about $4.5B of that specifically for computerization of it. Four years later, that money has been allocated or spent, and SGIP has to find other funding. Hence, SGIP is becoming a membership organization. Anyone who wants a place at the table has to pay a membership fee. There is a schedule of fees for for-profit and not-for-profit institutions; if we are to be members, I think it would be ISOC as a member, and I would expect SGIP to invoice according to ISOC's PIR+organizational member donations revenue. What I have told George Arnold of NIST and Paul Molitor of NEMA is that the equation has the flow of value in the wrong direction. I am there, representing the IETF, as a service to SGIP, but we don't derive value from the SGIP or from SGIP participation. Hence, having us pay a fee for the privilege of offering a service doesn't make sense. Rather, I am willing to participate as a guest when invited, and the IETF is willing to receive liaison notes and do work on the behalf of the industry as we have in 6lowpan, roll, and core. If anyone disagrees with my assessment, now would be the time to say so :-) _______________________________________________ smartobjectdir mailing list smartobjectdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir
- [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Vint Cerf
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Richard Shockey
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Bruce Nordman
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Russ Housley
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Ralph Droms
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [smartobjectdir] Smart Grid and SGIP Joe Touch