[smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5275 (2069)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 07 March 2010 07:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911013A8C2E for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:12:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2KHWpt-m7GQv for <smime@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822163A8B10 for <smime@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2C71DE0719; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:12:12 -0800 (PST)
To: turners@ieca.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, turners@ieca.com, blaker@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100307071212.2C71DE0719@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:12:12 -0800
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org
Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5275 (2069)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smime>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:12:10 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5275, "CMS Symmetric Key Management and Distribution". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5275&eid=2069 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Section: Appendix A Original Text ------------- CMC-CONTROL, EXTENDED-FAILURE-INFO FROM EnrollmentMessageSyntax { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(4) internet(1) security(5) mechansims(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-cmc2002-02(53) } Corrected Text -------------- CMC-CONTROL, EXTENDED-FAILURE-INFO FROM EnrollmentMessageSyntax { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-cmc2002-02(53) } Notes ----- We corrected the object identifier to place it into the correct tree in RFC 5272, this means that it needs to get corrected here were it is imported. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5275 (draft-ietf-smime-symkeydist-10) -------------------------------------- Title : CMS Symmetric Key Management and Distribution Publication Date : June 2008 Author(s) : S. Turner Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5275 (2069) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5275 (… Sean Turner