Small comments on pss-01
"Blake Ramsdell" <blake@brutesquadlabs.com> Thu, 01 May 2003 20:30 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09176 for <smime-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2003 16:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h41JvJi2077755 for <ietf-smime-bks@above.proper.com>; Thu, 1 May 2003 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.9/Submit) id h41JvJpi077754 for ietf-smime-bks; Thu, 1 May 2003 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from brutesquadlabs.com (gtec136-m.isomedia.com [207.115.67.136] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h41JvIi2077747 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Thu, 1 May 2003 12:57:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blake@brutesquadlabs.com)
Received: from DEXTER ([192.168.0.4]) by brutesquadlabs.com with ESMTP ; Thu, 1 May 2003 12:57:15 -0700
From: Blake Ramsdell <blake@brutesquadlabs.com>
To: 'Jim Schaad' <jimsch@nwlink.com>, ietf-smime@imc.org
Subject: Small comments on pss-01
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 12:57:15 -0700
Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAAAQAAAA8p5bbgeo7ESZs8YBuKezPgEAAAAA@brutesquadlabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In pss-01, I believe that draft-jonsson-pkcs1-v2dot1-00.txt has been released as RFC3447, so the reference "P1v2.1" probably needs updating. Also, the SHA2 normative reference is not used -- it may need to be moved to Informational References or removed completely. I remember some discussion about this at one point, but are we using X.208 and X.209 for references to ASN.1 / BER / DER instead of X.680 and X.690? If not, then these may need updating. Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com
- Small comments on pss-01 Blake Ramsdell
- RE: Small comments on pss-01 Jim Schaad
- RE: Small comments on pss-01 Blake Ramsdell