Re: SMIME report (IETF 75)

John Larmouth <j.larmouth@btinternet.com> Sun, 09 August 2009 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AFD3A6CC5 for <ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370, BAYES_20=-0.74, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCR-fd9dOGVC for <ietfarch-smime-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546193A6CC6 for <smime-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n79BtCc8015363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:55:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n79BtCBD015362; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:55:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from smtp812.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp812.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.72]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n79Bt3Oj015347 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:55:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from j.larmouth@btinternet.com)
Received: (qmail 92690 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2009 11:55:03 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=K9b0oxUEOCKHJhzEyLacSI4BP7vgWGFrN7j4R7zgPvAYnlIqhtxukvnHsovC63WLh90HHwOp26F+2Bi6VA9AwtljwXNZe1oj2U1Xn2Grbf9BnqwyfctxOEps3OZhea+KQGRqP+vEkfUsOSbtgwREgUgi2UaCPv/iAdd++WiMLt8= ;
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.75?) (j.larmouth@86.145.194.232 with plain) by smtp812.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2009 11:55:02 -0000
X-Yahoo-SMTP: wkRZlpKswBD4hYA5WOvxKyA0utS_ehUG.AZgJb2EFBo2v2XeQHg-
X-YMail-OSG: 5GyQFwoVM1mJEZuCAKFQFpDBE5FK8nRenLFrqq51ySMSGusJyIJcy6mUI32B.upEBMREIWJIlJ_AEA.zeoW2xVuOY8B2g8b7i3Yi38qNo3hUCPgLRmJX3RbaSsVyPobMlRI1bteaSr5of86jPvBDTMN2SdiXsei._WD09jLacvtAwTT2i0mEhQBivolKeKM5Npqa2cyK3WpbFBdQCxPXoRfo0siQgnX7G1giRJieCoj8GSR8h0KsMYR7lwgXOBiSvaXBLEJC2akERTXB0VPOZgzw9q2PcfFHYj8.dPDoxgdiv5ftTgoBoBNYaDYeOMHstY0hEO.9jMJOznlTAISWqWw4E0tc
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4A7EB914.3000508@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:55:00 +0100
From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@btinternet.com>
Reply-To: j.larmouth@btinternet.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
CC: saag@ietf.org, ietf-smime@imc.org
Subject: Re: SMIME report (IETF 75)
References: <4A7058C5.2060109@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A7058C5.2060109@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Folks,

This may be too late (we are not sure whether the comment was sent in 
earlier or not), or may already have been dealt with.

However, a colleague has checked the ASN.1 and reports:

"I have reviewed draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1-05.txt and 	also draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-05.txt
because the smime IMPORTS from that. Everything seems to be OK. I have only one comment about
draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-05.txt: in three places in OID values "member-body" is misspelled
as "memberBody".

Jean-Paul."

John L




Sean Turner wrote:

>
> The SMIME WG did not meet in Stockholm.
>
> We have 8 IDs.  Since the last meeting, 5 IDs have entered the RFC 
> editor's queue raising the number of SMIME WG IDs with the RFC editor 
> to 7:
>
> - draft-ietf-smime-multisig
> - draft-ietf-smime-sha2
> - draft-ietf-smime-3850bis
> - draft-ietf-smime-3850bis
> - draft-ietf-smime-3278bis
> - draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1
> - draft-ietf-smime-3852bis
>
> All of the documents are pinned on documents from PKIX, the TLP 
> revisions, or both.
>
> A new version of draft-ietf-smime-rsa-kem was posted to address 
> comments made by Steve Kent during his SECDIR review.  We issued a 2nd 
> WGLC because the revisions were pretty substantial.  One set of 
> comments, which I would categorize as minor, was received during the 
> 2nd WGLC.  A new version will be posted, and then the document will 
> passed to Tim Polk.
>
> Once all the documents have been published we will initiate the 
> procedure to shut down the WG.
>
> spt
>
>

-- 
   Prof John Larmouth
   Larmouth T&PDS Ltd
   (Training and Protocol Design Services Ltd)
   1 Blueberry Road                     
   Bowdon                               j.larmouth@btinternet.com
   Altrincham
   Cheshire
   WA14 3LS                 
   England
   Tel: +44 161 928 1605